Luna is still pining after Will on The Bold and the Beautiful. But Luna might forget about the Spencer heir to go after a Forrester.
Two Peas In A Pod
Luna (Lisa Yamada) has made it her mission to make Will (Crew Morrow) hers. So far, she’s disobeyed Li’s (Naomi Matsuda) orders to forget about Will. However, Luna might take her aunt’s advice when she sets her sights on a new man. That man could be none other than Thomas (Matthew Atkinson).
On X, one fan suggested the possibility of Thomas and Luna getting together.
Most fans disliked the idea; however, some were on board with the pairing. “2 cra cra’s together. Sounds like a wild, dangerous adventure,” one user wrote.
“Now that I could get behind,” one fan voiced their support.
“Like 2 peas in a pod,” one viewer replied.
“Firecrackers waiting to happen!!!! Ain’t nobody in LA getting no sleep with those 2 on the loose as a couple,” another fan wrote.
Thomas and Luna are two of B&B’s notorious baddies. While Luna is still causing mischief, Thomas has turned his life around. However, his return has sparked speculation that he might be returning to the dark side.
If Luna and Thomas were to become a couple, it’d definitely bring the shock factor. The Forresters will be appalled by the relationship, especially after what Luna did to RJ (Joshua Hoffman) and Zende (Delon de Metz).
But nobody would be more upset than Thomas’ sister Steffy (Jacqueline MacInnes Wood). Luna put Steffy through torture, and she wants nothing more than for Luna to be out of their lives. If this scenario happens, Luna will have wormed her way back in.
With Luna and Thomas together, it would mean trouble for many other characters. The question is who the couple will target first.
Got a storyline idea for your favorite couple? Send it to us at [email protected].
This story was originally reported on Soap Hub on September 8, 2025. Add Soap Hub as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.yahoo.com ’
