Sarah Ferguson reportedly feels extremely “betrayed” by one member of the Royal Family that she was once deemed very close to. The 66-year-old has recently come under fire for her connection to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – and has seen her public reputation in tatters as a result.
A source recently shared how Sarah is coping with being largely cut off by the Firm, along with her former husband, and father of her daughters, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. A source has said that she is “angry” and feels incredibly “wronged” by everyone in the Royal Family.
As reported by Heatworld, the unnamed source said: “Sarah feels incredibly betrayed… Fergie’s very bitter, she’s angry and feels wronged by everyone in the family.”
They added: “What people don’t see is just how low she’s sunk. Every time she opens a paper or goes online, it’s another reminder that she’s completely on the outside and there’s no real way back, and she’s really struggling to come to terms with that.”
Speaking of Sarah, they added that she feels particularly “betrayed” by Queen Camilla.
The source added: “After everything she’s been through with them, she feels she’s owed a heck of a lot more than being cut off without any proper explanation,” they said.
“She says they owe her at least a conversation and a shred of sympathy, especially someone like Camilla, who she once considered a close ally.”
Whilst Andrew now resides in Norfolk, Sarah’s permanent whereabouts remain unknown – although she is most definitely not in America.
An insider recently told the Mirror: “Sarah has made it clear to those around her she will never set foot in America again.
“She is deeply worried about the reaction she would face, whether from Epstein’s victims or scrutiny from Congress. She feels it would be unbearable and does not want to be put in a position under oath where she would be asked not only about Epstein but also about Andrew. It has not been a difficult decision despite how deeply entrenched in America she once was.”
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
