Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been the center of attention as they are reportedly traveling to the UK. According to a royal expert, a four-word assessment has been issued for the royal couple. Allegedly, commentator Richard Fitzwilliams claimed that the Sussexes could not be trusted.
Meanwhile, Harry is said to be prepping to bring his wife and his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to his homeland. The kids would be returning after four years. They last visited during the late Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee in 2022.
Expert believes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are not ‘trustworthy’
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would likely have to reshape their public image ahead of their upcoming visit to the UK. Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told The Express that the British public seemed to be “hostile” towards them. He claimed the reason to be the Sussex couple’s “behavior. “They are not trustworthy,” the commentator added.
According to him, Harry and Markle might explore “a future in Britain” after they couldn’t make it big in Hollywood. “What they do have is an international profile; the test is how they use it,” Fitzwilliams added.
Meanwhile, another royal expert, Nick Ede, advised the Duchess of Sussex to do some “charity work” during her trip, according to The Daily Express. He claimed that Markle should steer clear of promoting the brand. “A successful return would focus on meaningful charitable engagements, supporting causes close to her heart and avoiding any perception that the visit is being used to promote a brand, project or media venture,” he said.
Moreover, the Sussexes have not yet confirmed whether they would be traveling to the UK together. While Harry is reported to bring his family along, the security issue still raises questions. The Duke would reportedly not qualify for state-funded protection as he is no longer a working royal.
The post Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Hit With Brutal Four-Word Verdict — Expert appeared first on Reality Tea.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.aol.com ’
