When Forrest Gump was released on July 6, 1994, the film was immediately embraced by viewers and critics. From the main character’s innocent perspective to the four-decade-spanning political and social commentary, it was hard not to fall in love with Forrest Gump. “If any criticism might be leveled at the film, it is that its most heart-wrenching moments are too adeptly skirted, but, then again, that’s in keeping with Forrest’s strength,” The Hollywood Reporter wrote at the time.
The film made more than $670 million worldwide and was nominated for 13 Academy Awards. It ended up winning six, including Best Picture and Best Actor, making Tom Hanks the fifth performer to win back-to-back Oscars. The elite group he became part of consisted of Luise Rainer, Spencer Tracy, Katharine Hepburn, and Jason Robards. However, while many still love the film — it has a 95% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes — its share of detractors has also increased.
The Debate Over Passivity vs. Activism
One of the biggest criticisms many have taken with Forrest Gump in the decades since its release is that Forrest, who is more of a submissive, passive observer in life, seems to have everything go his way. Characters who are more outspoken and interested in changing the world, such as Jenny, struggle and encounter tragedy.
Some have looked at it through a political lens, comparing Forrest to a conservative and Jenny to a progressive. Director Robert Zemeckis has argued that the movie isn’t meant to be political but rather a satire.
“I think modern audiences have lost the understanding of irony because they watch a movie like Forrest Gump in isolation, and they don’t understand the irony of what it was, what it’s all about,” Zemeckis told Time. “They take it a hundred percent literally,” he says. “And filmmakers like me, who find irony in life and in art and in movies—that’s getting lost somehow.”
Representation and the Portrayal of Disability
Another criticism some have leveled against the film centers around Forrest’s disabilities. Some have felt that his low IQ is used as a tool to elicit laughs, while others have thought that an actor with an intellectual disability should’ve portrayed Forrest instead of Hanks.
And then there’s the argument that Pulp Fiction or Shawshank Redemption, two other films that Forrest Gump was up against for the Best Picture Academy Award, were better. Hanks disagrees.
“The problem with Forrest Gump is it made a billion dollars,” he told The New York Times. “If we’d just made a successful movie, Bob (director Robert Zemeckis) and I would have been geniuses. But because we made a wildly successful movie, we were diabolical geniuses. Is it a bad problem to have? No, but there’s books of the greatest movies of all time, and Forrest Gump doesn’t appear because, oh, it’s this sappy nostalgia fest. Every year there’s an article that goes, ‘The Movie That Should Have Won Best Picture’ and it’s always Pulp Fiction.”
“Pulp Fiction is a masterpiece without a doubt,” he added. “Look, I don’t know, but there is a moment of undeniable heartbreaking humanity in Forrest Gump when Gary Sinise — he’s playing Lieutenant Dan — and his Asian wife walk up to our house on the day that Forrest and Jenny get married.”
Forrest Gump occupies a unique space in cinema history: it is both an enduring, beloved classic and a perpetual lightning rod for critical debate. Whether one interprets it as a brilliant, ironical satire or a controversial, rose-tinted fable, its ability to stir such strong reactions decades later is perhaps the truest measure of its impact. Regardless of where one lands in the “Best Picture” debate, the film’s legacy is defined less by its Oscar haul than by its stubborn refusal to be forgotten.
About the author
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source parade.com ’
