<\/p>\n
The Netflix documentary Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser<\/a> raises questions around the ethics of one the most popular US reallity TV series of the 2000s. From claims about the cruel treatment of its contestants<\/a> and its callous endorsement of \u201cfatphobic\u201d narratives<\/a>, the series sits at odds with feelings around body image and weight in a post body-positivity age.<\/p>\n Recently in the UK reality television shows such as Love Island<\/a> have been under the spotlight<\/a> for alleged bullying and misogynistic behaviour. This perhaps shows that a more sustained reckoning is on the horizon for programmes dealing with our bodies, and their long-term effects on the collective psyche. <\/p>\n The idea for The Biggest Loser came to its executive producer David Broome when he spotted a sign posted by an \u201cobese person seeking a trainer\u201d to help them get into shape. The show would eventually see contestants and trainers battling to see who could lose the most body weight through the show\u2019s extreme methods, ultimately winning a prize of US$250,000 (\u00a3185,000).<\/p>\n This was a significant amount of money, especially for the time, but the real prize was supposedly the discipline and freedom gained through the process of radical body transformation. As such, the show is rooted in narratives of hard work, determination and ultimately the American dream \u2013 you can be anything you want, as long as you work hard enough. <\/p>\n