Prince Andrew should be kicked out of his Windsor Royal Lodge and disappear because the British public are \u2018sick\u2019 of him and he is an embarrassment to his family and the UK<\/a>,\u00a0according to Robert Jenrick<\/a>.<\/p>\n The shadow justice secretary\u00a0has said it is disgusting that taxpayers are subsiding him to live in a 30-room mansion with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson<\/a>\u00a0when he should be paying \u00a3200,000 a year.<\/p>\n ‘I don\u2019t see why the taxpayer frankly should continue to foot the bill. The public are sick of Prince Andrew’, he said.<\/p>\n It came after yet another shocking twist in the royal-Epstein scandal when it emerged last night he\u00a0hasn’t paid rent on his palatial property for 22 years.<\/p>\n And Andrew could become the first royal to be caught up in a criminal probe in more than 20 years. Scotland Yard has confirmed it is ‘actively’ probing claims he asked an officer to dig up dirt on Virginia Giuffre<\/a>, whose posthumous autobiography is out today.<\/p>\n Mr Jenrick said:\u00a0\u2018I don\u2019t think the taxpayer should in any way be footing the bill for him to live in luxury homes ever again. He shouldn\u2019t have any taxpayer subsidies going forward.<\/p>\n \u2018It\u2019s about time Prince Andrew took himself off to live in private and make his own way in life. He has disgraced himself, he has embarrassed the Royal Family<\/a> time and again.\u00a0<\/p>\n ‘The King deserves great respect and admiration for the way he has handled this. He is trying to do his absolute best to ensure Prince Andrew goes off, leads a quiet life and doesn\u2019t embarrass himself, the royal family or our country ever again<\/a>‘.<\/p>\n Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson (pictured in 2019) are holed up in their grace-and-favour Royal Lodge amid increased scrutiny over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. A leaked lease suggests they may not have paid rent on their home for 22 years<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Calls are growing for Prince Andrew to be kicked out of the Royal Lodge (pictured), the lavish Windsor mansion he shares with his ex-wife<\/p>\n<\/div>\n An unredacted copy of his lease emerged last night.<\/p>\n It shows that while he paid \u00a31million to lease the property in 2003 and spent \u00a37.5million on refurbishments, he has paid only ‘one peppercorn (if demanded)’ of rent a year since taking on the mansion 22 years ago.<\/p>\n This is because Andrew is deemed to have paid the rent \u2013 which was in the region of \u00a3260,000 a year \u2013 up front through the work he has funded to bring the palatial property up to scratch.\u00a0<\/p>\n It also means the Crown Estate will have to pay him around half a million pounds if he were to quit his mansion before the lease on it runs out in 2078.<\/p>\n A copy of the agreement was obtained by The Times newspaper following pressure from MPs and campaigners. And it will no doubt add to public outrage over Andrew’s perceived ‘perks’.\u00a0<\/p>\n Sources have stressed to the Daily Mail, however, that questions still remain over how the King’s brother can afford the vast 30-bedroom property, which comes with multi-million running costs.<\/p>\n The Daily Mail can exclusively reveal that Andrew is not believed to have received any significant inheritance from the Queen or Queen Mother<\/a>, raising fresh questions about how he can afford to stay in the property \u2013 particularly when he now receives no personal allowance from the King, or public funding.<\/p>\n Charles, 76, has desperately tried to persuade his younger brother to downsize and move out of the grade II-listed mansion in recent years.\u00a0<\/p>\n He believes many of Andrew’s problems \u2013 particularly those that saw him drawn to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein and other shady characters \u2013 stem from chasing a lifestyle he simply cannot afford.<\/p>\n But Andrew, 65, has stubbornly insisted that he has a cast-iron lease on the house. And as long as he pays the rent, the King has no legal right to throw him out.<\/p>\n The revelation comes as:<\/p>\n Beatrice and her sister Eugenie are said to have pulled out of a charity ball in London on Saturday amid the torrent of unedifying claims around their father.<\/a><\/p>\n While details of the Queen’s will have never been made public, it is thought that Andrew was not left sufficient funds to sustain his apparently lavish lifestyle.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i.dailymail.co.uk\/1s\/2025\/10\/20\/23\/103158435-15210951-image-m-7_1761000461904.jpg\")
<\/div><\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
![\"Princess](\"https:\/\/i.dailymail.co.uk\/1s\/2025\/10\/21\/07\/103142231-15210951-Princess_Beatrice_drives_from_Royal_Lodge_home_of_her_father_Pri-a-34_1761026684221.jpg\")
<\/div><\/div>\n