<\/p>\n
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor<\/strong><\/a> might not be getting his payout for moving out of the Royal Lodge.<\/p>\n Recent reports suggest that Andrew, 65, was set to receive a nearly $728,000 (\u00a3558,000) payout as part of a past agreement regarding his living situation. However, that all changed when the disgraced royal family member\u2019s title was stripped.<\/p>\n Us<\/em> understands that the Crown Estate will make the final decision regarding Andrew\u2019s payout after any work done to the property is assessed, which could impact the payment.<\/p>\n The Daily Mail<\/em> <\/a>reported that Andrew will be \u201cdenied\u201d most of the payout, with a royal source telling the publication that there is \u201ca lot of work\u201d that needs to be done on the property.<\/p>\n Us Weekly<\/em> has reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment.<\/p>\n Why Was Prince Andrew Stripped of His Titles? A Timeline of What Led to King Charles\u2019 Move<\/a><\/p>\n Andrew has been living rent-free<\/a> in the Royal Lodge, located in Windsor, for 22 years. Andrew\u2019s lease agreement had him living on the property until 2078, stating that he could receive the large sum of money if he gave up said lease.<\/p>\n Us<\/em> also understands that Andrew will be receiving an appropriate private provision<\/a> because he is King Charles III<\/strong>\u2019s brother. However, Andrew is meant to figure out any other sources of income.<\/p>\n Charles, 76, stripped Andrew of his prince title<\/a> on Thursday, October 30, and evicted the disgraced royal family member from his home.<\/p>\n \u201cPrince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor,\u201d a statement from Buckingham Palace to Us Weekly<\/em> read. \u201cHis lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence.\u201d<\/p>\n The statement shared that \u201cformal notice\u201d has since been given to Andrew. Us<\/em> understands he will relocate<\/a> to Sandringham Estate in Norfolk.<\/p>\n \u201cThese censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him,\u201d last week\u2019s statement read. \u201cTheir Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.\u201d<\/p>\n Charles\u2019 decision came as Andrew continued to make headlines for his connection to convicted billionaire sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein<\/strong>. Andrew\u2019s friendship with the late Epstein was first revealed in 2019 when the late Virginia Giuffre<\/strong> made allegations against the former prince.<\/p>\n Giuffre claimed that she and Andrew had sexual relations when she was underage in 2001. Andrew has continued to deny the allegations. Giuffre eventually sued Andrew for sexual abuse in 2021. They settled outside of court the following year.<\/p>\n Queen Elizabeth II Would Have Never Removed Andrew\u2019s Prince Title, Royal Expert Says<\/a><\/p>\n Giuffre died by suicide at age 41<\/a> this past April. Months later, her memoir, Nobody\u2019s Girl<\/em><\/a>, was posthumously published and included more allegations against both Andrew and Epstein.<\/p>\n \u201cIn the years since, I\u2019ve thought a lot about how he behaved,\u201d Giuffre wrote about Andrew, in part. \u201cHe was friendly enough, but still entitled \u2014 as if he believed having sex with me was his birthright.\u201d<\/p>\n Giuffre claimed that she had three sexual encounters with Andrew, one of which was an alleged orgy with Epstein.<\/p>\n \u201cThe other girls all appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn\u2019t really speak English,\u201d Giuffre wrote. \u201cEpstein laughed about how they couldn\u2019t really communicate, saying they are the easiest girls to get along with.\u201d<\/p>\n