{"id":2163558,"date":"2025-11-18T04:00:15","date_gmt":"2025-11-18T04:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/?p=2163558"},"modified":"2025-11-18T04:00:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T04:00:15","slug":"kansas-residents-prefer-kansas-city-chiefs-and-royals-to-stay-at-truman-sports-complex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/kansas-residents-prefer-kansas-city-chiefs-and-royals-to-stay-at-truman-sports-complex\/","title":{"rendered":"Kansas residents prefer Kansas City Chiefs and Royals to stay at Truman Sports Complex"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div id=\"brxe-mqyqxm\">\n<p>Residents of Overland Park and Leawood, the Sunflower State epicenter of a possible taxpayer-funded Kansas City Royals stadium, prefer that the Royals and the Kansas City Chiefs remain at the Truman Sports Complex rather than relocate.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the outcome of a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/client\/PollReport.aspx?g=e18ba66f-a1a1-411e-8dc2-b5d9e1b3c030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">public opinion poll<\/a> sponsored by the <em>Sentinel\u2019s<\/em> owner, Kansas Policy Institute, and conducted by SurveyUSA.<\/p>\n<p>Only 26% of those surveyed think the Aspiria Complex at 119<sup>th<\/sup> and Nall in Overland Park is the best place for a new Royals stadium, while 40% say the Royals should stay at Kauffman Stadium in Missouri\u2019s Truman Sports Complex; only 13% prefer a downtown Kansas City location. Fans won\u2019t get their wish, however, as Royals owner John Sherman is <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nfl.com\/news\/missouri-governor-says-new-public-aid-plan-in-the-works-for-chiefs-royals-stadiums\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff\">on record<\/span><\/a> saying the Royals will vacate Kauffman Stadium after their lease expires in 2030, if not sooner.<\/p>\n<p>Half of those surveyed say the Kansas City Chiefs should stay at Arrowhead Stadium, and 26% prefer a move to western Wyandotte County. The preferences hold across most age and income categories for the Chiefs stadium, and only those aged 18-49 and with incomes over $80,000 are within the six percentage points confidence interval (33% to 30% and 33% to 29%, respectively. A confidence interval is SurveyUSA\u2019s terminology for what is commonly called a margin of error.\/<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Asked specifically about locating the Royals stadium at the Aspiria Complex at 119<sup>th<\/sup> and Nall, 53% would support the move, and 40% are opposed.<\/p>\n<p>Adults aged 18-49 support the location, but those aged 50-64 are opposed within the margin of error and those aged 65 and higher are opposed. Those with income below $40,000 slightly oppose the use of taxpayer subsidies, but those with higher incomes are supportive<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28683 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-Aspiria.png?resize=780%2C248&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"780\" height=\"248\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-Aspiria.png?w=780&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 780w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-Aspiria.png?resize=300%2C95&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-Aspiria.png?resize=768%2C244&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Use of taxpayer subsidies to build Chiefs or Royals stadiums<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>While those surveyed prefer the Chiefs stay in Missouri, they are OK with the State of Kansas <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sentinelksmo.org\/kansas-to-call-timeout-with-clock-ticking-on-star-bond-deadline-as-chiefs-request-extension-to-continue-negotiation\/\">offering tax subsidies<\/a> to build professional sports complexes by a margin of 58% to 32%, with 10% uncertain.<\/p>\n<p>Support across age and income groups is relatively strong, although those with incomes below $40,000 are slightly opposed.<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28682 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/royals-state-subsidy.png?resize=780%2C227&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"780\" height=\"227\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/royals-state-subsidy.png?w=780&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 780w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/royals-state-subsidy.png?resize=300%2C87&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/royals-state-subsidy.png?resize=768%2C224&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px\"\/><\/p>\n<p>However, more participants are skeptical about the use of local tax subsidies, likely because of concern over property taxes.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, 47% support the use of local tax subsidies and 42% are opposed, making the issue a bit of a toss-up within the margin of error. The income level split is noteworthy, with support for local incentives among middle to lower incomes. People with less than $40,000 are strongly opposed (56% # to 38%), and those with incomes between $40,000 and $80,000 are supportive within one point of the margin of error ($49% to 42%), and those with incomes above $80,000 support local incentives by a 51-39 margin.<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28681 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-local-subsidy.png?resize=780%2C227&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"780\" height=\"227\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-local-subsidy.png?w=780&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 780w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-local-subsidy.png?resize=300%2C87&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/sentinelksmo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Royals-local-subsidy.png?resize=768%2C224&amp;quality=80&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px\"\/><\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"post-views-icon dashicons dashicons-chart-bar\"\/> <span class=\"post-views-label\">Post Views:<\/span> <span class=\"post-views-count\">15<\/span>&#13;\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><em> \u2018 The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> \u2018 Some details of this article were extracted from the following source sentinelksmo.org \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Residents of Overland Park and Leawood, the Sunflower State epicenter of a possible taxpayer-funded Kansas City Royals stadium, prefer that the Royals and the Kansas City Chiefs remain at the Truman Sports Complex rather than relocate. That\u2019s the outcome of a public opinion poll sponsored by the Sentinel\u2019s owner, Kansas Policy Institute, and conducted by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2163559,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2163558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royalty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Kansas-residents-prefer-Kansas-City-Chiefs-and-Royals-to-stay.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2163558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2163558"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2163558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2163560,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2163558\/revisions\/2163560"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2163559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2163558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2163558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2163558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}