<\/p>\n
Just under a year ago, the Royals and Reds made one of the first significant trades of the 2024-25 offseason when Kansas City acquired Jonathan India<\/a><\/strong> and Joey Wiemer<\/a><\/strong> in exchange for right-hander Brady Singer<\/a><\/strong>. The trade made plenty of sense at the time, as the Reds were in need of some reliability in their rotation while the Royals were desperate for offensive upgrades in the lineup. Singer fulfilled his role with the Reds for the most part, pitching to a solid 4.03 ERA in 32 starts. Things haven\u2019t been quite so rosy on the Royals\u2019 side of the equation, as Wiemer did not appear in an MLB game for the organization and India fell well short of expectations.<\/p>\n In 136 games this past year, the 28-year-old India split time between second base, third base, and left field while hitting .233\/.323\/.346 (89 wRC+). He was essentially a replacement level player, worth 0.4 WAR according Baseball Reference and -0.3 according to Fangraphs. That might sound surprising considering that India was within spitting distance of league average offensively and collected 567 plate appearances, but his defense was atrocious. His -14 Outs Above Average this year was in the first percentile among all qualified fielders, and he drew negative grades at every position he played. His -6 Defensive Runs Saved weren\u2019t quite as ugly but still well below par.<\/p>\n Did India struggle enough that his first year in Kansas City will also be his last? He\u2019s due to go through the arbitration process one final time in 2026, with MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz projecting<\/a> him for a $7.4MM salary next year. That\u2019s a hefty chunk of change to spend on a replacement level player, especially for a Royals club that doesn\u2019t have much money to spend this winter without first making room in the budget. While Michael Massey<\/a><\/strong>\u2019s 57 wRC+ in 77 games was even more disastrous than India\u2019s 2025 campaign, Massey is projected for a salary of just $2MM next year and is controlled through the 2028 season.<\/p>\n It\u2019s undeniable that India had the better numbers of the two and looking at his advanced metrics creates an argument that he could\u2019ve easily been an average or better hitter with a little luck. His 18.7% strikeout rate was actually the lowest of his career, and while a 9.5% walk rate was below his career norms it was still above league average. The big problems for India were that his BABIP dropped twenty points below his career norms while he managed to slug just nine home runs after being consistently good for 15 to 20 homer power during his time with the Reds.<\/p>\n The good news is that India\u2019s expected numbers were stronger than his actual production, so there\u2019s at least some reason to believe he could bounce back a bit in his age-29 season. Some of that reduction in power figures to be due to the difference between Great American Ballpark and Kauffman Stadium, however, as the Reds play at one of the friendliest stadiums in the majors for homers while the Royals undeniably have a pitcher\u2019s park. Meanwhile, Massey\u2019s season offers little in the way of statistical signs that better days on the way, but it\u2019s still worth noting he was a quality player as recently as last year and his 2025 season was marred by multiple injuries, including an ankle sprain and a broken wrist. Perhaps all Massey needs to turn things around for his age-28 season is better health.<\/p>\n If the Royals decided to stick with both players, they\u2019d been committing nearly $10MM to what would essentially be a second base platoon that was below replacement level in 2025. That\u2019s a big gamble given the club\u2019s limited resources, but there aren\u2019t really any safe options at the club\u2019s disposal. Non-tendering both players would leave the team with a hole and a free agent class somewhat thin on mid-tier infield talent (Willi Castro<\/a><\/strong>, Miguel Rojas<\/a><\/strong>) isn\u2019t likely to provide a substantial upgrade, leaving them to pursue possible trade candidates like Brendan Donovan<\/a><\/strong> and Nolan Gorman<\/a><\/strong>. Non-tendering India would free up the majority of that money while still keeping Massey in house as a potential upside option, but it\u2019s unclear if someone who would be better than India would be available at his price tag anyway. Non-tendering Massey would save a modest amount of money but, given his years of control, would only make sense if the team doesn\u2019t believe he\u2019ll be able to rebound. The non-tender deadline is Friday, giving the Royals just a few more days to make a decision.<\/p>\n How do MLBTR readers think the Royals should address second base this winter? Should they go with India, go with Massey, keep both, or send both packing in search of a new answer? Have your say in the poll below:<\/p>\n