{"id":2181035,"date":"2025-11-29T17:06:05","date_gmt":"2025-11-29T17:06:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/?p=2181035"},"modified":"2025-11-29T17:06:05","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T17:06:05","slug":"97-percent-of-people-struggle-to-identify-ai-music-but-its-not-as-bad-as-it-seems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/97-percent-of-people-struggle-to-identify-ai-music-but-its-not-as-bad-as-it-seems\/","title":{"rendered":"97 percent of people struggle to identify AI music, but it\u2019s not as bad as it seems"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Streaming service Deezer ran an experiment recently, with the help of research firm Ipsos. The finding \u2014 that 97 percent of people<\/a> can\u2019t tell the difference between fully AI-generated and human-made music \u2014 was alarming. But it\u2019s also not the whole story.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In the survey, 9,000 participants listened to three tracks and were asked to guess which, if any, were completely AI-generated. If the participant failed to guess all three correctly, they were put in the fail pile. That means if you got two of three correct, Deezer and Ipsos still said you couldn\u2019t tell the difference between fully AI-generated music and the real deal.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Deezer sent me the three tracks it used in the study, and so I decided to run my own (less scientific) experiment. I had 10 people listen to the same tracks and gave them the same prompt. People did have trouble identifying which songs were fully AI. Only one person got all three right. But if I didn\u2019t bundle the responses, the results were much less dire. People were able to successfully identify whether a track was AI or human-generated 43 percent of the time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It\u2019s also worth noting that several people told me one of the songs was so terrible, so obviously AI, that they thought it had to be a trap and guessed it was real.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Unsurprisingly, participants in Deezer\u2019s study were a little caught off guard by how poorly they performed. Seventy-one percent were surprised by the results, and 51 percent said it made them uncomfortable to not be able to tell the difference between AI- and human-created art.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Opinions on the impact were split, with 51 percent believing that AI will lead to the creation of \u201cmore low-quality, generic sounding\u201d music. Somewhat shockingly, only 40 percent said they would skip AI music without listening if they knowingly came across it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

One area where most agreed, however, was in the need for transparency. Eighty percent want AI-generated music to be clearly labeled. Right now, that has been Deezer\u2019s approach. It has created a system that can automatically detect and label 100 percent AI-generated content<\/a> from the most popular models like Suno and Udio. Deezer also excludes music that has been labeled as AI from its algorithmic recommendations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Spotify recently announced<\/a> steps to combat AI slop<\/a> on its platform, but stopped shy of saying it would explicitly label AI content. It announced policies regarding AI impersonation and a new spam filter that should keep many of the worst actors off its platform. But instead of blanket labeling, it\u2019s working toward a standardized credits system, saying, \u201cThe industry needs a nuanced approach to AI transparency, not to be forced to classify every song as either \u2018is AI\u2019 or \u2018not AI.\u2019\u201d That system, however, would rely almost entirely on labels and artists honestly disclosing when songs use AI, even if it\u2019s simply to help in the mixing process.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Manuel Moussallam, director of research at Deezer, tells The Verge<\/em> that there is a bit of a gray area around hybrid content that might use AI elements. But he says this is \u201cnot a technical problem. It\u2019s a transparency issue and it\u2019s an ethical issue\u201d that will require all parties involved, from the creators to the music distribution services like DistroKid to the streaming platforms, to act responsibly.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

What is clear is that the amount of AI-generated music being uploaded is staggering, and only increasing. Deezer says that it receives over 50,000 AI-generated tracks per day, which accounts for more than 34 percent of music added to the service.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Moussallam says that, while the company is receiving a dizzying amount of AI content, it only accounts for 0.5 percent of streams, and the vast majority of that tiny sliver is fraudulent. While he admits that it does pose some challenges for Deezer simply due to the volume, he doesn\u2019t believe it drastically changes the experience for users. \u201cHumans continue to create music, and they will continue to listen to the music made by real artists,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Holly Herndon<\/a>, who has used custom AI models<\/a> extensively in her own music, agrees, telling The Verge<\/em> that, \u201cjust because anyone can create polished kitsch things doesn\u2019t mean anyone will care about those songs. An art practice is much more sophisticated than that.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Seventy percent of respondents to the survey believe that these fully AI songs pose a threat to the livelihood of musicians, and 64 percent believe that AI could lead to a reduction in creativity. But Moussallam is less pessimistic, saying, \u201cWe\u2019re not headed towards a future where humans are removed from the creative process, just the AI is going to be integrated into the creative processes.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Follow topics and authors<\/strong> from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.<\/span><\/p>\n