Prince Harry<\/a> and Meghan Markle<\/a> have made a dramatic reversal on a long-held decision about their children, Prince Archie<\/a> and Princess Lilibet<\/a> \u2013 prompting speculation over why the couple are now insisting on the children hanging onto the royal titles they once set aside.<\/p>\n Sources tell RadarOnline.com<\/em><\/a> the shift followed a crucial conversation with two of Harry’s closest relatives and reflects a desire to secure their children’s status within the monarchy, even from their home in America.<\/p>\n Since stepping back from royal duties in early 2020<\/a>, Harry, 41, and Meghan, 44, have slammed the royal family.<\/p>\n And initially, they chose not to use the Prince and Princess titles their children were entitled to from birth \u2013 a decision that surprised many in The Firm.<\/p>\n But in 2023, the couple formally adopted their children’s princely and princess designations, prompting a flurry of questions about what motivated the change.<\/p>\n Prior to this, the children were listed as Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor.<\/p>\n A palace source said the couple’s decision to embrace the titles surprised royal watchers, recalling the late Queen had been “as angry as I’ve ever seen her” when they chose the name Lilibet for their daughter, as it was drawn from the Queen’s private childhood nickname.<\/p>\n And palace insiders now say the conversation that changed their minds came with Princess Beatrice<\/a>, 37, and Princess Eugenie<\/a>, 35.<\/p>\n “Harry and Meghan understood that keeping the titles would benefit the children in more than just name,” a source said.<\/p>\n “It’s not about status alone \u2013 it’s about access, opportunities, and giving Archie and Lilibet a clear position within the royal structure if they need it in the future.”<\/p>\n Another source added: “Harry and Meghan were determined to cling on to their children’s royal titles. “Meghan felt it would be advantageous for both her children and also herself.”<\/p>\n She developed surprisingly close ties with some royals, particularly Beatrice and Eugenie, and saw how useful a title can be for navigating certain social and professional circles. That’s why they are so intent on retaining them.”<\/p>\n Under historic Letters Patent issued by King George V in 1917, only the sovereign’s children, male-line grandchildren, and the eldest son of the heir apparent were automatically entitled to princely designations.<\/p>\n As great-grandchildren of Queen Elizabeth II<\/a>, Archie, 6, and Lilibet, 4, were initially ineligible for the honors.<\/p>\nThe Titles They Initially Set Aside<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n
Influence of Beatrice and Eugenie<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n
Eligibility Through Succession<\/h2>\n
<\/div>\n