Yesterday, the Royals made a big announcement. Kauffman Stadium, long one of the most cavernous venues in the majors, is going to be a little less warehouse-like this year<\/a>. The walls are moving in nine or 10 feet more or less across the board, and getting shorter by a foot and a half to boot. That\u2019s a meaningful change for a stadium where home runs generally go to die. How massive? Time to crank up the old computer and find out.<\/p>\n I plugged the new dimensions from Kansas City\u2019s press release into an equation describing a rough arc. I fit those points to a cubic spline so that it could more closely resemble the actual stadium, with its pinched-in corners. I made a few approximations as well; for instance, the wall is moving to a height of eight and a half feet \u201cin most places,\u201d so I just applied that across the board. I also modeled the old dimensions the same way. That way, I had two different virtual walls built to compare some batted ball data against.<\/p>\n Notably, my approximation isn\u2019t a perfect replica of the stadium. I don\u2019t have a millimeter-scale, or even a yard-scale, map of the place. I can\u2019t account for outfielders robbing home runs, which is definitely going to be more common with the lowered walls, though still quite rare overall. But by running it through both the old and new wall dimensions, I think that this unavoidable error can be minimized. It\u2019s pretty clear that no balls that were home runs with the old outfield parameters will suddenly not be home runs with the new ones, so the thing we\u2019re looking for is the difference, assuming that my approximation is close enough to reality. And it is: My modeling says that over the last three years respectively, 205, 162, and 159 batted balls hit in Kansas City should have turned into homers. In reality, it\u2019s been 186, 147, and 151. <\/p>\n My estimates run a little hot, in other words, but they\u2019re very consistent. A visual inspection of the batted balls that were misclassified is mostly a pile of extra-base hits off the wall, a few strange-angled blasts that trick my trajectory-smoothing model, and a few leaping catches. Any of these will surely turn into homers with the new dimensions. As long as we\u2019re just using this model to look at changes, I feel very comfortable with it, and in fact it may slightly underestimate the increase in home runs.<\/p>\n With that said, let\u2019s get to the data. I compared every batted ball from 2025 to both sets of wall coordinates and identified 43 new home runs in the new configuration:<\/p>\n \n You Aren’t a FanGraphs Member\n <\/p>\n \n It looks like you aren’t yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren’t logged in). We aren’t mad, just disappointed.\n <\/p>\n \n We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we’d like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.\n <\/p>\n 1. Ad Free viewing! We won’t bug you with this ad, or any other.<\/p>\n 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.<\/p>\n 3. Dark mode and Classic mode!<\/p>\n 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.<\/p>\n 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.<\/p>\n 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn’t sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)<\/p>\n 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.<\/p>\n 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don’t be a victim of FOMO.<\/p>\n 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.<\/p>\n 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!<\/p>\n \n We hope you’ll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we’ve also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn’t want to overdo it.\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n I ran the same test for every year we have Statcast data for \u2013 after all, with the walls already virtually built, I can throw a lot of different batted ball sets at it without much effort. The average increase in homers over the past 10 years (excluding the shortened 2020 season, a sentence I\u2019ll probably have to keep writing forever, like Sisyphus) was 51 per season. That\u2019s a chunky increase, and with nine of the 10 values between 40 and 60 (2023 had a 70-homer increase in the power-happiest actual year of Kauffman data), I feel pretty confident in the size of the effect.<\/p>\n What kinds of batted balls have turned into home runs? The most valuable ones you can possibly imagine, basically. Kauffman is huge<\/em>. Most of the 43 batted balls that I classified as in play in 2025 but home runs in 2026 landed safely for hits even with the old dimensions. They had an average wOBA of .943, with a .700 BABIP. They were missiles, basically; balls hit at ideal home run angles, liners and fly balls shot over the head of outfielders with no chance of getting to them but held in by the giant park. So 43 new homers isn\u2019t 43 more hits \u2013 it\u2019s more like 43 new homers, 13 fewer outs, and 30 fewer doubles and triples.<\/p>\n Want to see where the new homers would land? Well, everywhere:<\/p>\n The reason that none of the dots are right at the new wall is that you have to clear it, and the distances I\u2019m using are projected landing points. But you get the idea; pull the walls in everywhere other than center, and you\u2019re going to get a ton more home runs everywhere other than center. The few straggling dots in the middle are the odd beneficiaries of the lower walls.<\/p>\n What will this do to run scoring? I can hazard a guess, though it\u2019ll still just be a guess until we see actual games in the new dimensions. Swap in, say, 50 new homers (a nice round number close to the average increase from above), swap out the aggregate mix of doubles, outs, and triples that they \u201cused\u201d to be, and you get an increase in total run scoring of 57.2 runs across 81 home games. That\u2019s for both teams, of course, since I used every batted ball to bulk up the sample size. That\u2019s an extra .35 runs per team per game, still a meaningful boost. Even after paring that down somewhat on the assumption that fielders will do better on the remaining balls in play thanks to having a smaller area to cover, that\u2019s still a giant lift.<\/p>\n While Kauffman has long been one of the worst stadiums in baseball for home runs, it wasn\u2019t an offensive wasteland. Park factors put it around neutral overall. Last season was actually the first year since 2019 where the Royals scored more runs on the road than at home. That doesn\u2019t mean it\u2019s wildly offense-friendly \u2014 home field advantage exists \u2014 but a number of different park factor approximation methods independently peg the stadium as roughly average overall. Add 0.3 runs to each team each game, or even 0.25 if you really think that BABIP will decline a ton thanks to the smaller dimensions, and we\u2019re talking one of the friendlier stadiums in the league for offense. <\/p>\n Of course, the actual effect on scoring will be more nuanced and seasonal than my broad re-classification of batted balls. Dr. Daniel Mack, the team\u2019s vice president of research, explained<\/a> some of the additional factors the team considered when making the change: \u201c(Senior analyst) Alan (Kohler) and I started breaking it down. What\u2019s the effect of the walls? What\u2019s the effect of the altitude? What\u2019s the effect of the temperature and wind? Trying to figure out how to take all those effects into account and balance them.\u201d Kauffman doesn\u2019t play the same year round; Kansas City has huge variance in weather throughout the year, with meaningfully changing air resistance and wind patterns. The stadium plays differently in April than it does in July, something I didn\u2019t even attempt to model in my quick take. But averaged across the year, I think the increase in scoring is at least in the realm of what\u2019ll happen, adding enough home runs to more than take the sting out of the lost doubles.<\/p>\n I might not have the exact week-to-week fluctuations down, but the data is still good enough to make some predictions. I first noted which players would have seen the largest increases in Kauffman home runs with the new dimensions. Maikel Garcia<\/a>\u2019s 2025 batted balls would have produced five more homers with the new walls, per this estimation, while Jonathan India<\/a> would also see his homer total increase by five. Salvador Perez<\/a>\u2019s would increase by four, with Vinnie Pasquantino<\/a>\u2019s and Bobby Witt Jr.<\/a>\u2019s going up by three apiece.<\/p>\n We can go further back. Here\u2019s a leaderboard of career homers \u201cgained\u201d in the alternate universe where Kauffman always had smaller dimensions:<\/p>\n Most Home Runs \u201cGained\u201d If New Dimensions And, naturally, a leaderboard of the pitchers who would have suffered the most. I\u2019m shocked that Yordano Ventura<\/a> is on there with only two seasons of data, but he happened to give up a ton of not-quite-homers in those two years:<\/p>\n Most Extra Homers Allowed if New Dimensions While the magnitude might be uncertain, the direction of the change is clear. The new stadium dimensions are going to make for meaningfully more home runs. That\u2019s very much on purpose. As Mack detailed<\/a> to Jeff Passan, the goal of this change in dimensions was to produce a league average run value on fly balls in the park. While Kauffman plays like a roughly neutral park overall, it greatly suppresses home runs while juicing doubles and triples.<\/p>\n Fly ball run value has historically been low in Kaufmann because a disproportionate amount of that value comes from homers, while the extra doubles and triples have juiced the value of line drives. That doesn\u2019t mirror the incentives in every other stadium in the majors, and this change addresses that directly. <\/p>\n Well, kind of directly. The new dimensions definitely help fly balls. By my estimation, 24 fly balls that didn\u2019t leave Kauffman in 2025 would have been home runs with the new walls. But 19 line drives that didn\u2019t leave the park in 2025 would have gone out as well. Now, to be sure, the line drives were far more productive than the fly balls with the old wall configuration, so the upgrade to fly ball value is real. But line drives are getting more valuable, too. And while the new dimensions will reduce the area outfielders need to defend, Kauffman will still boast meaningfully more outfield square footage than average, so the days of gappers and speed are hardly over.<\/p>\n Will Bobby Witt Jr. mash a trillion home runs in 2026? Will the Royals become the new hot offense in KC with Patrick Mahomes on the shelf and the Chiefs in a brief downturn? We won\u2019t know until they play the games. But Kauffman has always been more offense-friendly than the spacious dimensions would suggest, a sort of mini-Coors. Pull the walls in, and we could be in for some fun slugfests. I hope the Pasquatch<\/a> has been doing his cardio.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n \u2018 The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n \u2018 Some details of this article were extracted from the following source blogs.fangraphs.com \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images Yesterday, the Royals made a big announcement. Kauffman Stadium, long one of the most cavernous venues in the majors, is going to be a little less warehouse-like this year. The walls are moving in nine or 10 feet more or less across the board, and getting shorter by a foot and a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2235889,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2235888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royalty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Analyzing-Kauffman-Stadiums-New-Dimensions.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2235888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2235888"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2235888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2235890,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2235888\/revisions\/2235890"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2235889"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2235888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2235888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2235888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"http:\/\/blogs.fangraphs.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Kauffman-25.png\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/blogs.fangraphs.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Kauffman-History.png\")
<\/p>\n
Had Started in 2015<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Had Started in 2015<\/p>\n<\/div>\n