<\/p>\n
\n \n Photographs appear to show former Prince Andrew<\/a> on all fours leaning over a woman or girl lying on the floor, in the latest release of Epstein files<\/a> from the US Department of Justice on Friday.\n <\/p>\n \n In one undated image, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor looks directly at the camera as he crouches over the fully clothed figure, whose face has been obscured.\n <\/p>\n \n Another photograph shows Mountbatten-Windsor\u2019s hand placed on the same person\u2019s abdomen. In the background, another unidentified person props their feet up on a table, which has a stack of towels on it.\n <\/p>\n \n The latest Epstein documents also contain an email exchange between convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Mountbatten-Windsor in August 2010 in which the disgraced financier invites the royal to meet a \u201cfriend\u201d for dinner in London.\n <\/p>\n \n Mountbatten-Windsor replies he would be \u201cdelighted to see her\u201d and tells Epstein to give her his contact details.\n <\/p>\n \n Epstein then describes her as a 26-year-old Russian that is \u201cclevere (sic) beautiful, trustworthy,\u201d and confirms that she has Mountbatten-Windsor\u2019s email.\n <\/p>\n \n The messages are sent two years after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting sex with a minor.\n <\/p>\n \n More than a month later, in another set of emails, Epstein and Mountbatten-Windsor make plans to meet in London. Mountbatten-Windsor suggests dinner at Buckingham Palace where they would have \u201clots of privacy.\u201d Epstein writes that the pair will \u201cneed\/have private time.\u201d\n <\/p>\n \n It is unclear when or where the images were taken; no captions or context for the photographs was provided with the document release. Neither the photographs nor the email messages suggest any wrongdoing. celebrity.land has attempted to contact Mountbatten-Windsor for comment.\n <\/p>\n \n Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied all accusations against him and insisted that he never witnessed or suspected<\/a> any of the behavior of which Epstein was accused. In a now-infamous BBC interview in 2019, he said that he severed all ties with Epstein in 2010.\n <\/p>\n \n The Justice Department on Friday released its latest tranche of files<\/a> related to the investigation into Epstein, six weeks after its Congressional deadline to do so.\n <\/p>\n \n The new photographs and email exchanges have <\/strong>cast additional scrutiny on Mountbatten-Windsor over Epstein links, which eventually led King Charles to strip his brother<\/a> of his \u201cprince\u201d title and evict him from his Windsor mansion in an extraordinary move last year.\n <\/p>\n \n Commenting on the latest revelations, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called on Mountbatten-Windsor to testify before the US Congress about his links to Epstein, adding that former prince would be failing the pedophile\u2019s victims if he con\u00adtinues to refuse to do so.\n <\/p>\n \n \u201cFirstly, I always approach this question with the victims of Epstein\u2019s in mind. Epstein\u2019s victims have to be the first priority,\u201d Starmer told reporters on Saturday.\n <\/p>\n \n \u201cWhether there should be an apology, that\u2019s a matter for Andrew. But, yes, in terms of testifying, I\u2019ve always said anybody who\u2019s got information should be prepared to share that information in whatever form they\u2019re asked to do that because you can\u2019t be victim-centered if you\u2019re not prepared to do that,\u201d he added.\n <\/p>\n \n Buckingham Palace did not offer a fresh statement when approached by celebrity.land on Saturday. Instead, it pointed to its October 2025 statement<\/a> outlining King Charles\u2019 decision to remove Mountbatten-Windsor\u2019s style, titles and honors.\n <\/p>\n \n Last month, the DOJ released another cache of Epstein files, which underlined Mountbatten-Windsor\u2019s relationship with not only Epstein but Epstein\u2019s then-girlfriend, disgraced former British socialite\u202fGhislaine Maxwell<\/a>.\n <\/p>\n
\n London<\/span>
\n \u00a0\u2014\u00a0
\n <\/cite>\n<\/p>\n