{"id":2268072,"date":"2026-02-05T15:18:45","date_gmt":"2026-02-05T15:18:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/?p=2268072"},"modified":"2026-02-05T15:18:45","modified_gmt":"2026-02-05T15:18:45","slug":"can-rolis-new-ai-music-coach-really-match-up-to-a-human-piano-teacher-we-get-the-exclusive-first-look","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/can-rolis-new-ai-music-coach-really-match-up-to-a-human-piano-teacher-we-get-the-exclusive-first-look\/","title":{"rendered":"Can ROLI’s new AI Music Coach really match up to a human piano teacher? We get the exclusive first look"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

NAMM 2026 was absolutely dominated by AI-discourse. There were many eager music tech companies looking for new ways to incorporate the alleged world-changing potential of it. Then, there were those generative AI-oriented outfits trepidatiously floating around the show, subtly attempting to integrate themselves within a cautious industry.<\/strong><\/p>\n

While AI is, of course, a broad topic, a widespread perception for many in the music-making sphere is that AI is an existentially damaging force. What’s more, is a pervading feeling that this disruptive new power should not be engaged with in any capacity. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s a view largely fostered by the rejection of copyright-infringing, generative AI-platforms, evolving into a mass lumping-in of anything labelled with those two little letters as aspects of the same malevolent entity. Even the stuff that may actually be pretty useful, is frequently tarred with the brush.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n