<\/p>\n
Andrew\u2019s titles and honours, as well as Ms Ferguson\u2019s, were axed last year by the King, in a bid to distance the monarchy from the embarrassing revelations continuing to emerge. However, at the time, it was understood that Beatrice and Eugenie\u2019s royal standing would not be affected in the slightest by their parents\u2019 misfortunes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
But as more details about the Yorks\u2019 dealings with Epstein emerged, the sisters\u2019 status amid the royal feud sparked debate about how their future could unfold.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Now royal expert Jennie Bond said that it would be best if the York sisters left their royal status behind.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
She told the Mirror<\/a>: \u201cI don\u2019t think either of them has ever flaunted their titles, but there\u2019s obviously a huge cachet in some circles about being called a Princess. A title like that opens doors and sets up connections, which both Beatrice and Eugenie have used to their advantage.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cThere\u2019s nothing wrong in that, but now that their father has been stripped of his titles and their mother can no longer use hers, they might like to quietly drop the use of theirs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cI don\u2019t see the need for them to renounce them publicly, but it might be prudent to sever links with the York name \u2014 now so very tarnished \u2014and just use their married names.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Ensure our latest royal headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. <\/strong>Click here to activate<\/a><\/strong> or just add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n