Here’s one person you won’t<\/i> be seeing in one of the year’s most anticipated movies.<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"I](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/Kl2Tj21Bst1CwpHSkw_Y3g--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTE0NDA7Y2Y9d2VicA--\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/5abfcf48634f810a6dde81a2771cf9b7\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n Axelle\/Bauer-Griffin \/ FilmMagic<\/span><\/p>\nLet’s get down to business: The Devil Wears Prada 2<\/i><\/a> is imminent. Specifically, it hits theaters on May 1. You’ll see it, I’ll see it \u2014 pretty much the whole **** country is about to be seated.<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/aJpq_qrOdZdjBT000EAv3g--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTUzOTtjZj13ZWJw\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/22ef7506bee6f9ccada5f045eea75122\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n Macall Polay \/ Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\nSo, when the movie was in production last year, at one point Sydney Sweeney<\/a> \u2014 who we all know and, well, have some sort of opinion about<\/a> \u2014 was seen shooting a scene for the film. Here’s a photo of her under an umbrella:<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"Two](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/0Cz6weqWlQ_2XDHchwVc7Q--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTEyMTA7Y2Y9d2VicA--\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/dfac64717cbe01ebec11afa0eab813bf\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n Jose Perez\/Bauer-Griffin \/ GC Images<\/span><\/p>\nRelated: Die-Hard Fans Are Struggling To Name Even 50% Of These British Royal Family Members From Their Photos, So I Doubt You Can Do Better<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nWell, Entertainment Weekly<\/a> reports that Sydney’s turn won’t be showing up in the film at all \u2014 and a source claimed to reveal the reason why as well.<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"Two](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/02lXoCr0WwcQ0W1pUZY_wg--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTY0MDtjZj13ZWJw\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/057e80653adbd49fd9a76b66c4e4dda8\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\n\nAdvertisement<\/p>\n
\n\nAdvertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nAdvertisement<\/p>\n
\n\nAdvertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Related: Sarah Jessica Parker Was Left Literally Speechless Over Lauren S\u00e1nchez\u2019s Vogue Cover, And The Whole Interaction Is Hilarious<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nThe publication claims that Sydney’s appearance took place early in the film, with Emily Blunt’s character Emily Charlton (hey, did they gave her that character name on purpose?) styling Sydney \u2014 who, if it isn’t apparent at this point, was supposed to be playing herself \u2014 while the film’s other protagonists visit Emily at the Dior offices.<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"Person](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/3KIpZgQRY5G26UwRCa.NOQ--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTY0MDtjZj13ZWJw\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/65d4c865416744f2c7a5c362b71bd579\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n TheStewartofNY \/ GC Images<\/span><\/p>\nAccording to EW’s source, “the scene did not work structurally with the rest of the sequence” \u2014 so, out it apparently went. “The team working on the movie was grateful for her participation, making the decision to remove the bit a difficult one,” the publication added.<\/span><\/h2>\n![\"Two](\"https:\/\/s.yimg.com\/ny\/api\/res\/1.2\/skUu1D43Wbu0zNGEsjY_rg--\/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTQwMjtjZj13ZWJw\/https:\/\/media.zenfs.com\/en\/buzzfeed_articles_778\/297e9fde71afcf71a9a0cde072abe0c6\"\/)
<\/span><\/div>\n Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\nRelated: \u201cMy Name Isn\u2019t Megan\u2026\u201d: Here Are 14 Times Celebrities Were Put In Seriously Awkward Situations Because People Had Done Exactly Zero Research<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nHmm. Hmm!<\/i> Very interesting stuff, to say the least. We’ve contacted reps for Sydney and Disney<\/a> for further comment and we’ll let you know if we hear back.<\/span><\/h2>\nAlso in Celebrity: What 16 Celebrities Looked Like Before And After Facelifts<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nAlso in Celebrity: If You Can Identify 24 Of The 33 Celebrities In These Blurry Photos, Your Eyesight Is Better Than 78% Of The Population<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nAlso in Celebrity: Murder, ****** Assault, And Massive Fraud: 15 Celebrities Who Are In Jail For A Long Time<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
Axelle\/Bauer-Griffin \/ FilmMagic<\/span><\/p>\n Macall Polay \/ Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\n Jose Perez\/Bauer-Griffin \/ GC Images<\/span><\/p>\n Related: Die-Hard Fans Are Struggling To Name Even 50% Of These British Royal Family Members From Their Photos, So I Doubt You Can Do Better<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\n Advertisement<\/p>\n Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Advertisement<\/p>\n Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Related: Sarah Jessica Parker Was Left Literally Speechless Over Lauren S\u00e1nchez\u2019s Vogue Cover, And The Whole Interaction Is Hilarious<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n TheStewartofNY \/ GC Images<\/span><\/p>\n Disney \/ Everett Collection<\/span><\/p>\n Related: \u201cMy Name Isn\u2019t Megan\u2026\u201d: Here Are 14 Times Celebrities Were Put In Seriously Awkward Situations Because People Had Done Exactly Zero Research<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Also in Celebrity: What 16 Celebrities Looked Like Before And After Facelifts<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Also in Celebrity: If You Can Identify 24 Of The 33 Celebrities In These Blurry Photos, Your Eyesight Is Better Than 78% Of The Population<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Also in Celebrity: Murder, ****** Assault, And Massive Fraud: 15 Celebrities Who Are In Jail For A Long Time<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nLet’s get down to business: The Devil Wears Prada 2<\/i><\/a> is imminent. Specifically, it hits theaters on May 1. You’ll see it, I’ll see it \u2014 pretty much the whole **** country is about to be seated.<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
So, when the movie was in production last year, at one point Sydney Sweeney<\/a> \u2014 who we all know and, well, have some sort of opinion about<\/a> \u2014 was seen shooting a scene for the film. Here’s a photo of her under an umbrella:<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
Well, Entertainment Weekly<\/a> reports that Sydney’s turn won’t be showing up in the film at all \u2014 and a source claimed to reveal the reason why as well.<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
The publication claims that Sydney’s appearance took place early in the film, with Emily Blunt’s character Emily Charlton (hey, did they gave her that character name on purpose?) styling Sydney \u2014 who, if it isn’t apparent at this point, was supposed to be playing herself \u2014 while the film’s other protagonists visit Emily at the Dior offices.<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
According to EW’s source, “the scene did not work structurally with the rest of the sequence” \u2014 so, out it apparently went. “The team working on the movie was grateful for her participation, making the decision to remove the bit a difficult one,” the publication added.<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
Hmm. Hmm!<\/i> Very interesting stuff, to say the least. We’ve contacted reps for Sydney and Disney<\/a> for further comment and we’ll let you know if we hear back.<\/span><\/h2>\n