wrote<\/a>. Another added, \u201cTo be honest, clothes are meant to be worn.\u201d<\/p>\nOthers questioned why the look was even controversial in the first place. \u201cSo how did she destroy it?\u201d one person asked, while another wrote, \u201cShe is iconic\u2014she is not ruining it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Several fans also pointed out that archival fashion has become extremely common on modern red carpets. \u201cLiterally all celebs wear archives\u2026 this is not the same as the Monroe dress lol,\u201d one user commented.<\/p>\n
Others defended Kardashian\u2019s handling of vintage pieces specifically, with one person writing, \u201cIf you\u2019ve ever watched The Kardashians<\/i> or seen anything she does, you would know she takes extensive care of these pieces.\u201d<\/p>\n
Many also argued that the situation was far less serious than the backlash surrounding the Marilyn Monroe dress. \u201cThis is nothing to be outraged about\u2014it\u2019s an archival designer piece from 1997,\u201d another commenter wrote. \u201cMost celebrities do this.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another fan summed up the defense by saying, \u201cNobody would even be talking about it if she didn\u2019t wear it. She\u2019s giving these pieces a chance to be admired again instead of gathering dust.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n