<\/p>\n
King Charles has become Britain\u2019s first monarch in modern times to reveal how much tax he pays on his private income: \u00a324.6m over the last two years.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s a move celebrated by some as heralding an era of greater transparency from the monarchy. But just how open has it been?<\/p>\n Buckingham Palace said that it was the \u201cexpress wish\u201d of the monarch to publish this piece of information. His aides say the decision is part of a wider drive to be more open with the public.<\/p>\n Sceptics, however, point out that the royals have endured a run of bad publicity over Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, prompting MPs to demand more information about their finances. The king will also be aware of the need to assuage public opinion at a time when more Britons appear to be questioning the existence of the monarchy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The royal finances have been described as shrouded in fog<\/a>, and Thursday\u2019s tax declaration does little to clear it. British monarchs are not liable for tax, but the king and his mother before him started paying it voluntarily in 1993. The amount payable has been declared for the first time this year, but very little else has been revealed.<\/p>\n All we have is a line in the royal household\u2019s report, which states: \u201cHis majesty\u2019s tax payable for 2024-25 was \u00a312.9m (2023-24: \u00a311.7m). The total amount of tax payable by his majesty since accession to the throne is more than \u00a330m.\u201d<\/p>\n The income on which the king owes tax has not been declared. We know he received \u00a325.2m from the Duchy of Lancaster in 2025-2026 (up from \u00a324.4m the year before), but earnings from his private estate, which includes financial investments and property, remain under wraps.<\/p>\n Another unanswered question is how much the king deducted from his Duchy income for official expenses. Any money spent in the course of his duties is tax exempt. It could amount to millions, but the figure hasn\u2019t been declared.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The publication of the king\u2019s tax bill will do little to illuminate the big question of how wealthy he is.<\/p>\n The extent of his personal fortune is by and large concealed from public view. The Windsors\u2019 personal finances have habitually been enveloped in entrenched secrecy. The Guardian, however, conducted a comprehensive audit<\/a> of the king\u2019s assets \u2013 from country piles and diamond-encrusted jewels, to paintings by Claude Monet and Salvador Dal\u00ed, Rolls-Royces, racehorses and rare stamps \u2013 in 2023.<\/p>\n It estimated his personal wealth at \u00a31.8bn. Buckingham Palace said the figure was a \u201chighly creative mix of speculation, assumption and inaccuracy\u201d, but that it had a policy of refusing to comment on the royal family\u2019s personal finances.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Yes:<\/p>\n There are 11 members of the Windsor family<\/a> who carry out royal duties. Seven are paid an income for their work from Charles\u2019 own wealth, but no one knows how much. The amounts paid individually to even minor royals used to be published, but changes introduced by David Cameron\u2019s government in 2011<\/a> put an end to that.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n The Windsors have been given gifts worth millions of pounds, such as paintings, jewellery and horses, over decades. It is unclear whether these gifts were given to them personally or as part of their official roles. Equally unclear is what happened to them. Many appear to have been absorbed into the Windsors\u2019 personal fortune. Charles could clarify which gifts are now among his family\u2019s private holdings.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n Why has the king published his tax bill?<\/h2>\n
\nHow significant is the publication?<\/h2>\n
\nHow wealthy is the monarch?<\/h2>\n
\nAre there are other things the king could do to increase transparency about the royals\u2019 finances ? <\/h2>\n
\n