{"id":2492498,"date":"2026-07-07T20:53:55","date_gmt":"2026-07-07T20:53:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/?p=2492498"},"modified":"2026-07-07T20:53:55","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T20:53:55","slug":"royal-family-prince-harry-calls-privacy-suit-dismissal-a-whitewash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/royal-family-prince-harry-calls-privacy-suit-dismissal-a-whitewash\/","title":{"rendered":"Royal Family: Prince Harry calls privacy suit dismissal a &#8216;whitewash&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div id=\"ArticleContent\">\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Prince Harry, the estranged younger son of King Charles, and other high-profile British figures, lost their privacy lawsuits against the Daily Mail\u2019s publisher, in a comprehensive defeat in the royal\u2019s last legal battle with the British press.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Harry, who lives in California but by coincidence was in Britain when London\u2019s High Court gave its ruling, has brought several legal cases against the British press and has long railed against their alleged abuse of power.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">The prince, 41, has long blamed the press for the 1997 Paris car crash that killed his mother, Princess Diana, and compared her treatment to that of his American wife Meghan, holding back tears in the witness box in January as he said the Daily Mail had made Meghan\u2019s life \u201can absolute misery\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1sli41u-StyledInlineContainer eze0guv0\">\n<div class=\"css-1cjzv6h-StyledContainer eze0guv14\">\n<div class=\"css-xfurzh-StyledContentContainer eze0guv12\">\n<div mode=\"inline-article\" class=\"css-12xvyva-StyledFormContainer eze0guv11\">\n<p class=\"css-3mk41m-StyledText eze0guv9\">Sign up to The Nightly&#8217;s newsletters.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-1r9pdr5-StyledSubText eze0guv8\">Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"css-115rfbc-StyledTermsText eze0guv1\">By continuing you agree to our<!-- --> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/thenightly.com.au\/subscription-terms\">Terms<\/a> <!-- -->and<!-- --> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sevenwestmedia.com.au\/privacy-policies\" target=\"_blank\">Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">He had previously won against the publisher of the Daily Mirror tabloid and settled a claim with Rupert Murdoch\u2019s British newspaper arm, but Tuesday\u2019s ruling is a significant defeat in his battles with the media.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">\u201cHis campaign against the other newspaper groups has largely been successful,\u201d media lawyer Mark Stephens told Reuters.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure class=\"css-ejwv7g-StyledFigure e1rue1fc3\"><picture class=\"e1rue1fc2 image css-1ipkvf0-PictureWithIntrinsicRatio-StyledArticleImage eosncpx0\"><source data-ratio=\"4:3\" media=\"(min-width: 0px)\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=200 100w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=300 150w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=500 250w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=640 320w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=828 414w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=1000 500w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=1280 640w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=1656 828w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=2048 1024w,https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.webp?imwidth=4096 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 767px) 90vw, (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1020px) 90vw, 810px\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.thenightly.com.au\/publication\/C-22546165\/070f6759230d1af8bdccb709e03ca690e8efe03a.jpg?imwidth=810\" alt=\"Prince Harry has lost his privacy lawsuit against the publishers of the Daily Mail. \" class=\"css-tl044d-StyledNoScriptImage-StyledImage eu9mom10\"\/><\/picture><figcaption class=\"e1rue1fc0 figcaption css-15vgixo-StyledFigCaption-StyledFigcaption e13f1dd25\"><span class=\"css-nqzxtu-StyledFigCaptionText e13f1dd24\"><span class=\"css-1vt5x9l-Caption e13f1dd23\">Prince Harry has lost his privacy lawsuit against the publishers of the Daily Mail. <\/span><span> Credit: <!-- -->AAP<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">\u201cBut I think it\u2019s time to reappraise what the media today is and it\u2019s very different to the media of (the time of) Princess Diana.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Harry said the judgement was \u201ca complete and obvious whitewash\u201d, in a statement issued on behalf of him and fellow claimant Doreen Lawrence, whose son Stephen was murdered by a gang of white men in a notorious racist attack in 1993.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Associated said Tuesday\u2019s ruling was \u201can overwhelming victory for the Daily Mail and its journalists and for a free press generally\u201d, adding that it would seek its legal costs after a trial it said cost more than 50 million pounds ($A96 million) in total.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Harry and the other claimants, including Elton John, alleged dozens of stories about them published by Associated Newspapers in the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday from the 1990s to 2011 were based on information which had been obtained unlawfully.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Their lawyers alleged information was obtained by private investigators, by hacking into messages on mobile phones, tapping landlines or obtaining personal information, such as medical records, by \u201cblagging\u201d ? deceiving people into handing over confidential details.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Associated, however, said the allegations were smears and the Daily Mail\u2019s long-serving former editor Paul Dacre accused Harry of hypocrisy for alleging invasions of his privacy while having repeatedly spoken publicly about the royal family.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">\u201cI feel sorry for the way a confused and angry young man has been drawn into this case,\u201d Dacre, formerly one of Britain\u2019s most powerful press figures, said in a statement.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Judge Matthew Nicklin said in his ruling that the claimants had needed to prove that information published about them had been obtained unlawfully, but suspicion was not enough.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Dismissing Harry\u2019s case in relation to one specific article about his relationship with then-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, Nicklin said that \u201cprivacy alone does not prove unlawful acquisition\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1cszuyn-StyledMobilePaddingContainer eywe6cv4\">\n<p class=\"css-9czhig-StyledParagraph e4e0a020\">Harry and Lawrence said in their statement: \u201cWe presented to the court evidence which we believed was compelling at the time and remains so now.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><em> \u2018 The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> \u2018 Some details of this article were extracted from the following source thenightly.com.au \u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prince Harry, the estranged younger son of King Charles, and other high-profile British figures, lost their privacy lawsuits against the Daily Mail\u2019s publisher, in a comprehensive defeat in the royal\u2019s last legal battle with the British press. Harry, who lives in California but by coincidence was in Britain when London\u2019s High Court gave its ruling, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2492499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[26934,28927],"class_list":["post-2492498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royalty","tag-uk","tag-world"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Royal-Family-Prince-Harry-calls-privacy-suit-dismissal-a-whitewash.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2492498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2492498"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2492498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2492500,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2492498\/revisions\/2492500"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2492499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2492498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2492498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/celebrity.land\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2492498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}