General Hospital’s latest episode had a few interesting twists awaiting fans, and it seems that this episode has also led to an interesting theory about the ongoing plotline of Michael trying to prove his innocence. Perhaps, fans have discovered that Michael has another alibi apart from the complicated case of Jacinda.
General Hospital fans explain why Michael needing Jacinda as his alibi is just absurd
The latest episode of General Hospital has emphasized heavily that Michael needs Jacina to testify about his whereabouts to get through these challenging circumstances. The episode delved generously into this plotline and showed the many ways both sides were trying to extract their desired result from Jacinda.
But a discussion in a thread on Soaps.com seems to indicate that this plotline is absurd and that writers may have missed something crucial here. As pointed out by a user, Michael and Jacinda went to a bar where he paid with his credit card. The bartender should remember him, and his credit card transaction should also be proof enough of him being there.
“Why would Michael need to find Jacinda when the bartender clearly remembers Michel being at the bar and paying for his and Jacinda’s drinks with his credit card? He presented Michael with the receipt, then Michael signed it and left right away,” the user wrote on Soaps.com.
Other users joined in the discussion and shared how they also evidently saw this flaw in the plot. “Shhhhhhh, the writers might hear your logic and learn something!” one user wrote while another said, “She is irrelevant at that point,” emphasizing that Jacinda was not needed.
So, General Hospital will soon resolve the mystery of Drew’s shooting, and it seems that things are indeed moving towards some twisted territories.
The upcoming episodes of General Hospital will delve more into this.
The post General Hospital Fans Prove Why Michael Doesn’t Need Jacinda as His Alibi appeared first on ComingSoon.net – Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.yahoo.com ’
