The NFL’s decision to name Bad Bunny as the next Super Bowl halftime headliner has triggered an immediate wave of outrage from MAGA circles
Appointing a halftime show headliner is always a contentious event, but the tone and type of debate vary dramatically based on the actual performer. Sometimes, the debate is on the quality and appeal of the music itself. Other times, people have claimed to be debating the music while insidious undertones suggest it’s more about misogyny or racism.
But now MAGA is saying what used to be the quiet part out loud—they don’t want Bad Bunny performing at the Super Bowl halftime show because his music is in Spanish, and a lot of them seem to be incorrectly assuming he’s not a U.S. citizen.
Who is Bad Bunny?
Bad Bunny is a Puerto Rican artist who has repeatedly topped Billboard charts and was the most listened to artist worldwide on Spotify for three years in a row. Since then, he’s maintained a spot in the top three and continued to make new music while also venturing into acting and wrestling.
Many people have theorized that he was chosen as the halftime performer specifically because of his international appeal.
“Bad Bunny will be breaking all halftime show records because of his international audience,” wrote @Jeremy_Hecht. “An audience that the NFL has been trying to tap into for a longtime. Not to mention he’s the 2nd most-streamed artist IN AMERICA besides Taylor Swift. He’s a perfect pick.”
But MAGA folks describe him differently. Rightwing podcaster Benny Johnson made a now-viral post on X “introducing” his audience to Bad Bunny by writing that he’s a “Massive Trump hater,” “Anti-ICE activist,” “No songs in English.”
“He even canceled his entire U.S. tour for this reason: ‘F***ing ICE could be outside my concert. And it’s something that we were talking about and very concerned about,'” he wrote.
(To clarify, Bad Bunny didn’t cancel a U.S. tour; he just never scheduled any dates for his current tour in the U.S. in the first place for the aforementioned reasons.)
MAGA reactions, and the resulting mockery
As soon as Bad Bunny was announced, it was clear how right-wingers were going to react. Vocal anticipation that folks with things like “Proud MAGA” and “God Bless President Trump” in their social media bios would jump to racist and xenophobic commentary started happening directly alongside those people fulfilling expectations.
Former racecar driver Danica Patrick was among the Bad Bunny critics, writing, “Oh fun. No songs in English should not be allowed at one of America’s highest rated television events of the year… not just for sports.”
“‘We’re not racist!’ maga response to bad bunny, a puerto rican artist (us citizen) for the super bowl”
“No songs in English should not be allowed at one of America’s highest rated television events of the year… not just for sports.”
“The NFL Hates America. They Hate you…Don’t give them your money”
“Kid Rock and Jason Aldean would have made a great Super Bowl Halftime show. Bad Bunny will just further divide the American people. A missed opportunity from the NFL to bring people together and tone down the rhetoric.”
“Are dumb MAGAs really out here saying ICE should be called on Bad Bunny like Puerto Ricans aren’t citizens or something”
“Id rather have a colonoscopy without anesthesia than watch that crap.”
But no matter how much MAGA wants to cry about Bad Bunny’s selection, they’re still not winning the culture wars.
“I don’t listen to Bad Bunny’s music but he is sexy, talented, has hits and will probably drag the current administration on that stage,” wrote @Coolness941.
“Bad Bunny: outing millions of racists by existing,” wrote @johnpavlovitz.
The internet is chaotic—but we’ll break it down for you in one daily email. Sign up for the Daily Dot’s newsletter here.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.yahoo.com ’
