The UK government announced on Sunday it will strip Prince Andrew of his final military honour – the honorary title of vice-admiral – marking another dramatic fall from grace for the embattled Duke of York amid ongoing fallout from his connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The decision comes just days after King Charles III removed all remaining royal titles and honours from his younger brother on Thursday, following mounting public pressure over Andrew’s association with Epstein and allegations made by trafficking victim Virginia Giuffre.
Defence Minister John Healey confirmed the government’s intention during an appearance on BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg programme, stating the move follows guidance from the King.
“We’ve seen Andrew surrender the honorary positions he’s had throughout the military,” Healey said. “Guided again by the king, we are working now to remove that last remaining title of vice-admiral that he has.”
The minister added that the government would also seek royal guidance on whether Andrew should forfeit his military medals earned during his 22-year naval career, including service as a helicopter pilot in the 1982 Falklands War.
Thursday’s announcement from Buckingham Palace marked an extraordinary public censure of a senior royal family member. In an unusually harsh statement, the Palace declared that “Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor,” adding that “these censures are deemed necessary” despite his continued denials of wrongdoing.
The statement also expressed the King and Queen’s “utmost sympathies” with “victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse” – a notable departure from previous royal communications on the matter.
Palace insiders suggest the unprecedented action reflects growing frustration within the royal family over Andrew’s handling of the scandal. According to sources quoted in The Sunday Times, there has been “long been a sense from the family that the voices of the victims needed to be heard.”
A friend of King Charles and Queen Camilla described Thursday’s statement as “extraordinary,” telling the newspaper: “That’s the closest you’ll get to the king and his court passing judgment on his brother.”
The latest developments coincide with the release of new court documents in the United States, including emails showing Andrew’s continued contact with Epstein after the financier’s 2008 conviction. In a 2010 email, Andrew wrote to Epstein following his release from jail, suggesting they should “catch up in person” during a planned trip to New York.
Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s primary accuser, detailed allegations against Andrew in her posthumous memoir published in October, claiming she was trafficked to have sex with him on three occasions, twice when she was 17 years old.
ALSO READ: King Charles strips Andrew of royal titles and Windsor home
Andrew has consistently denied all allegations of sexual abuse. However, UK media reports suggest he has refused to approve any public statements acknowledging the victims since his disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, which sparked widespread criticism for his apparent lack of empathy.
The scandal has drawn international attention, with US President Donald Trump commenting on the situation Sunday while aboard Air Force One. When asked by reporters, Trump said he felt “badly for the family,” describing it as “a terrible thing” and “a tragic situation.”
Trump’s own past associations with Epstein have become a political liability, adding another layer of complexity to the international dimensions of the scandal.
Queen Camilla’s longstanding advocacy for abuse victims has reportedly influenced the family’s approach to the crisis. Palace sources indicate growing concerns about the reputational damage to the monarchy, with the royal family increasingly isolated from Andrew’s position.
The Duke of York was initially stripped of his honorary military titles by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 following Giuffre’s civil lawsuit, which was later settled out of court. The latest actions represent the most severe consequences yet for a member of the royal family in living memory.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source novanews.co.za ’
