A leading Perth trademark lawyer has explained what could have prompted David and Victoria Beckham to ask their son, Brooklyn Peltz Beckham, to sign away the rights to his name, which the expert called “extraordinary” and “bizarre”.
The ongoing Beckham family feud boiled over on Tuesday after Brooklyn posted a lengthy and explosive statement to Instagram claiming his parents have endlessly attempted to destroy his marriage to Nicola Peltz through media leaks and sabotage.
The 26-year-old confirmed long-running rumours that tensions peaked at his Palm Beach wedding, saying Victoria hijacked his first dance and “danced very inappropriately” on him in front of 500 guests.
Brooklyn also alleged David and Victoria tried to “bribe” him into signing away the rights to his name.
“Weeks before our big day, my parents repeatedly pressured and attempted to bribe me into signing away the rights to my name, which would have affected me, my wife and our future children,” his statement said.
“They were adamant on me signing before my wedding date because then the terms of the deal would be initiated. My holdout affected the payday, and they have never treated me the same since.”
Intellectual property lawyer Dave Stewart at Bennett Lawyers found the idea of Brooklyn not being able to use his surname for the benefit of trying to promote himself “quite extraordinary” and “pretty bizarre”.
“If this allegation is correct, his parents have proposed to him that he can no longer use his name or his surname for the purposes of promoting himself, given he’s a model and an aspiring chef, that’s quite a big deal,” he said.
“From their perspective, if he decided to go off and set up a restaurant and call it, Beckham’s, or called it Brooklyn Beckham’s, or whatever, then I guess their complaint is he’s benefiting from the goodwill and reputation that they’ve built up in their surname over a period of decades.
“On the other hand, he should be able to use his own name to go out and and promote himself and any businesses that he decides to attach himself to and if this is correct, is it some sort of turf war between him and his parents where they are so reliant upon using their name to endorse products and services?
“Could it be said that they don’t want the competition?”
Manchester United’s golden boy and his Spice Girl wife have spent decades creating Brand Beckham — combining fame, fashion and football to redefine modern stardom.
“Their brand has always been about control of narrative, image, and legacy,” PR expert Mark Borkowski told the BBC last year.
This mirrors what Brooklyn said in his statement. That his “parents have controlled narratives in the press about our family” for his entire life, describing the allegedly “performative social media posts, family events and inauthentic relationships” as “a fixture of the life I was born into.”
“My family values public promotion and endorsements above all else.
“Brand Beckham comes first.”
Mr Stewart said it was “strange thing” for the Beckhams to ask a relative let alone a son but was “certainly possible”.
Victoria registered Brooklyn Beckham’s name as a trademark in the UK on December 22 in 2016 when he was 16-years-old for an array of goods and services like shave lotions, body scrubs and gels, fragrance, clothing, footwear, toys and more.
It is owned by Victoria as a “parent and guardian” of Brooklyn at the time and will expire in December this year.
This perhaps adds truth to Brooklyn’s claims of why his parents “repeatedly pressured” him to sign away his name rights so they could sort out the issue of ownership before the deadline.
“Those sorts of arrangements are typically pretty lucrative for any sort of celebrity. So if what he’s saying is correct, then the idea is to carve him out from those opportunities,” Mr Stewart said.
“Given he is no longer a child, Victoria Beckham cannot hold herself out any longer as holding Brooklyn Beckham’s name as a trade mark in her capacity as ‘parent and guardian’.”
David on Wednesday spoke in public for the first time since the bombshell allegations where he discussed the dangers of social media.
“I have always spoken about social media and the power of social media. For the good and for the bad,” he said on CNBC’s financial program Squawk Box.
“The bad we’ve talked about with what the kid can access these days, it can be dangerous, but what I have found personally, especially with my kids as well, use it for the right reasons.”
Victoria is yet to address the claims.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.perthnow.com.au ’
