British government documents released Thursday reveal that Queen Elizabeth II personally backed Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s appointment as a U.K. trade envoy in 2000.
Officials moving quickly to install the royal in the influential overseas role despite no evidence of a formal vetting or due diligence process.
The papers, published as part of a parliamentary update to the House of Commons, detail how ministers and senior civil servants advanced the appointment after the Duke of Kent signaled his intention to step down from trade promotion duties.
The documents show the late monarch Elizabeth wanted her son—then known as the Duke of York—to succeed him, and government officials appeared eager to expand his public role abroad, long before the formal proposal landed on ministers’ desks.
The Epstein Links
Mountbatten-Windsor stepped down from his trade envoy status in 2011 over allegations linked to his closeness to late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor.
The former prince was infamously photographed with Virginie Giuffre, who would later go on to accuse him of sexually assaulting her in 2001 when she was 17 and a sex trafficking victim of Epstein’s.
She said that she had sex with Mountbatten-Windsor on three occasions, and that Epstein paid her $15,000 after she had sex with the former prince in London.
In August 2021, Giuffre sued Mountbatten-Windsor in New York for “sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.”
The lawsuit was settled in February 2022. The former prince paid Giuffre an undisclosed amount, made a donation to her charity, denied wrongdoing, and settled without admission of liability.
Denials Over Andrew’s Expenses
Questions were already being asked over Mountbatten-Windsor’s appointment in 2000 when the Government moved to deny suggestions the former prince had requested £100,000 of office expenses.
While the Government position appears to be that the stories were wrong, it does reflect a mismatch between the way the decision to give him the job was being discussed publicly at the time compared to the official, internal communications.
The New Files
The newly released files raise broader questions about accountability, privilege, and the extent to which royal influence shaped government decisions behind closed doors.
For the public, the story sets up a debate about who gets scrutinized, who gets trusted automatically, and whether standards applied to ordinary public servants were ever imposed on a senior royal.
Trade minister Chris Bryant told MPs that records from February 2000 showed Sir David Wright formally proposed Mountbatten-Windsor for the role while citing “Her late Majesty’s wish” that he take over international trade promotion responsibilities.
Bryant said the position was designed to include “two or three trade promotion visits overseas per year, visits to U.K. regions and receiving prominent overseas trade visitors in the U.K.”
But the minister acknowledged a striking omission in the process.
“We have found no evidence that a formal due diligence or vetting process was undertaken,” Bryant said in his statement to Parliament. “There is also no evidence that this was considered.”
The revelation is likely to intensify scrutiny of how Mountbatten-Windsor, once viewed as a high-profile ambassador for British business, was elevated into a sensitive government-linked role with minimal documented oversight.
According to Bryant, officials had already been discussing ways to broaden the former prince’s public responsibilities before the appointment was finalized. In January 2000, then-Foreign Secretary Robin Cook reportedly agreed that “greater use should be made” of the prince in support of British trade interests overseas.
The files suggest the government saw Mountbatten-Windsor as a valuable asset capable of opening doors for British business leaders abroad, leveraging royal prestige to strengthen diplomatic and commercial relationships.
Former Prince’s Arrest and Denials
A separate police investigation has revived damaging questions about Mountbatten-Windsor’s judgment and conduct.
Thames Valley Police in England arrested the former prince in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office after reports alleged he leaked confidential government trade information to Epstein during his tenure as trade envoy. He was later released under investigation, and no charging decision has been announced.
Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently denied wrongdoing connected to Epstein.
Government officials emphasized that the newly released records relate primarily to the former prince’s original appointment and not to the substance of the ongoing police inquiry. Ministers also said precautions were taken to ensure publication of the documents would not interfere with detectives’ work.
Official Duties and Personal Interests Blurred
Still, the details contained within the files offer fresh insight into how carefully Mountbatten-Windsor’s image and public activities were managed from the beginning.
One document reveals concerns raised by Captain Neil Blair, Mountbatten-Windsor’s principal private secretary at the time, over the prince’s participation in golfing events during official overseas visits.
Kathryn Colvin, then head of the government’s Protocol Division, noted in correspondence that Blair “particularly asked that The Duke of York should not be offered golfing functions abroad.”
“This was a private activity,” the memo continued, “and if he took his clubs with him he would not play in any public sense.”
While seemingly minor, the request has drawn renewed attention because it echoes long-running criticism that Mountbatten-Windsor blurred the line between official duties and personal interests during international trips.
Those concerns have been amplified in recent years by claims made in historian Andrew Lownie’s biography Entitled, which alleged Mountbatten-Windsor at times treated official travel as an opportunity for private networking and personal benefit.
The former prince withdrew from public royal duties following his disastrous 2019 BBC interview about Epstein and has since largely disappeared from official life.
However, the publication of government records—particularly those directly linking Queen Elizabeth II to his appointment—risks drawing the late monarch into renewed public debate over the handling of her son’s career.
The latest disclosures are expected to fuel calls for greater transparency surrounding royal appointments and the informal influence historically exercised by the monarchy within government.
Update, 05/21/2026, 8:07 a.m. ET: The article has been updated with further information.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.newsweek.com ’
