In a four-word warning, Lynn said removal of their titles would “risk creating public backlash”. The commentator added that their own identities and work should be viewed separately. Lynn said: “Their roles as royal princesses and as private individuals carving out their own careers and identities remain separate from Andrew’s controversies. “Retaining their titles maintains fairness, respects their personal achievements, and avoids unnecessary complications for the Royal Family.”
The expert told GB News: “Removing them could create more headlines for all the wrong reasons and inadvertently draw attention to the very issue they have no part in.”
Neither Beatrice nor Eugenie is a full-time royal working on behalf of the King, and instead, they have their own jobs and charity interests.
Both Beatrice and Eugenie have been mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files, which were released by the Department of Justice earlier this year. One email appeared to suggest that the Princesses accompanied their mother to meet Epstein shortly after his release from prison, after being found guilty of soliciting a minor for prostitution.
Ensure our latest royal headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or just add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings
There is no suggestion that Beatrice or Eugenie have committed any crimes, and they were just 19 and 21 at the time of the alleged post-prison lunch with Epstein.
Reports have claimed that no decision has yet been made on what would happen to their place in the succession line if their father were removed.
Andrew’s eldest daughter, Beatrice, is ninth in line to the throne, followed by her two daughters, Sienna and Athena. Eugenie is in 12th place, with her sons August and Ernest in 13th and 14th place.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
