As the backlash caused by Prince Andrew‘s ties to Jeffrey Epstein reached a fever pitch following the release of emails allegedly sent by Epstein that seemed to prove Andrew lied in past public statements about his association with the convicted sex offender, King Charles was reportedly doing a secret juggling act behind-the-scenes.
Rather than step in to formally strip his disgraced younger brother of his royal titles, Charles arranged for Andrew to voluntarily relinquish his titles instead. While the end result for Andrew is more or less the same, this technicality had major implications for Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
According to The Sun, the King was “protecting” his nieces by not stripping him of his titles—at least not officially. The Sun also reports that Andrew was “forcibly pushed onto his sword” by the Charles, who had apparently reached “tipping point” with his younger brother.
Behind-the-scenes, the King is “said to have led frantic negotiations” with Andrew about how the situation would be handled, according to The Sun’s report, which goes on to say that “following crunch talks, Andrew, 65, finally fell on his sword and gave up his royal titles amid growing fury over the sex abuse scandal.”
Engaging in said “frantic negotiations” to convince Andrew to step back, rather than simply stripping the disgraced royal of his titles, was the King’s way of “protecting” his nieces, royal sources have claimed in the wake of the move.
If Charles had stepped in to remove Andrew’s titles, it would have reportedly affected his Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie’s rights to use their titles, which is something the monarch was reportedly firmly against.
According to The Sun, “The King was determined to avoid impacting Beatrice and Eugenie—who he has great affection for—it is believed.”
While Andrew did bow to the pressure to step back voluntarily, former BBC presenter Jennie Bond said his conspicuous use of “we” instead of “I” in his official statement belied the significant pressures from other royals that drove the decision.
“This is a clear indication that extreme pressure has been put on Prince Andrew to do the decent thing and fall on his sword,” Bond told Sky News (per The Sun). “There’s no word of apology or contrition as he was forcibly lowered onto his sword. He has no self awareness.”
Bond added that, even though the King preferred to have Andrew step back voluntarily, it’s clear from the former Duke of York’s statement that Charles was prepared to force his brother’s hand if necessary.
“If he hadn’t fallen on his sword he would have been pushed very firmly onto it,” Bond said.
According to royal author Phil Dampier, Andrew’s demotion was “inevitable” and the recent email leaks were just the final straw that pushed King Charles to take action.
“This was becoming inevitable as the crisis has been piling up for some time,” Dampier explained. “The revelation Andrew had lied has clearly tipped the situation over the edge that made it difficult for the King to endure it any longer.”
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.marieclaire.com ’
