Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are coming under fire for their unofficial visits across the world.
After the couple’s Australian tour, royal reporter Jane Moore believes Harry and Meghan are trying to get the benefits of being a royal without the hard work.
“Milking their ‘Duke and Duchess’ titles for all their worth, the Montecito grifters have just completed a Down Under ‘royal tour’ by any other name,” she wrote for The Sun.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry at the Australian National Veterans Arts Museum in 2026. By: MEGA
Moore pointed out that the pair is going against Queen Elizabeth II‘s wishes after they ditched England in 2020 with their recent appearances.
“Remember when our late Queen — who would have been 100 this week — told Harry and Meghan that they couldn’t be ‘half-in, half-out’ members of the royal family and they flounced off to America in a hissy fit?” she asked.
“Well, four years after her death, they are ‘royals for sale’ and no one seems able, or perhaps willing, to stop them,” the journalist noted.
Despite the criticism, Meghan and Harry reportedly feel their time in Oz was a success.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on the first day of their Australian tour in 2018. By: MEGA
“In her mind, it proves everything she’s been saying all along,” a source told In Touch.
“That she doesn’t need the palace machine to shine because she just naturally connects with people in a way that feels far more authentic and modern,” the insider claimed.
“The outpouring of love they’ve gotten in Australia has really lit a fire under her, and she wants to keep this momentum going,” the source said. “There are plenty of places to travel to next.”
While Suits actress and the Spare author might be thinking they’ve hit their stride, The Firm is reportedly not happy with their latest moves.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend a fundraiser in 2025. By: MEGA
“The Palace is livid,” a source told Rob Shuter for his Naughty But Nice Substack. “It looks like a full-scale royal tour without the permission slip.”
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.yahoo.com ’














