Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could be set to remain at Royal Lodge until October 2026 due to one major reason. The 65-year-old gave the 12-month notice on October 30, which means that he could be allowed to stay in the property until that date next year.
The disgraced royal signed a 75-year lease for the 30-room property back in 2003, before officially moving in the following year. He was later joined by his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson in 2008, with the former couple having already divorced back in 1996.
While he could stay in the property until October 30, 2026, it is expected that he will move into a private property on the King’s Sandringham estate in Norfolk early next year.
Although it has previously been reported that Andrew could receive compensation for evicting the property, the Crown Estate has now revealed that this is now unlikely to happen.
If no end-of-tenancy repairs were required, Andrew would have been entitled to £488,342.21 for ending his tenancy next October.
However, the Crown Estate have said that following an inspection of the property on November 12 it was thought unlikely that any compensation will be paid.
The Crown Estate have said: “Our initial assessment is that while the extent of end of tenancy dilapidations and repairs required are not out of keeping with a tenancy of this duration, they will mean in all likelihood that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor will not be owed any compensation for early surrender of the lease… once dilapidations are taken into account.”
Sources have recently reported that Andrew just wants to be treated “fairly” when it comes to the decision surrounding his next home.
It has been claimed that the disgraced royal is now “reeling off demands and ultimatums” about his future living arrangements in Norfolk.
Speaking of demands from Andrew, they also added that he has been asking for a “substantial six or seven bedroom house on the Sandringham Estate, complete with staff including a cook, gardener, housekeeper, driver and police security”.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
