Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor told the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that he was considering “abdication”, according to a bizarre email exchange. The email, which was written by Epstein to an unnamed recipient, was sent on May 8, 2011.
The email read: “Stuff bad for [Andrew’s] girls. Got police protection taken away. Queen [Elizabeth] said np royal list, get a job. [Sarah Ferguson] has a specific question for you. [Andrew] is sad and frustrated. Considering abdication, but he’s like a zoo animal, no way, especially now, for him to thrive.” He then goes on to explain how he visited their home, Royal Lodge, the previous day, where the former couple had been living together since 2008, to take “his laundry”.
He describes Andrew and Sarah as “a little shocked”, adding that Andrew “said yes” and that Sarah “wasn’t amused”.
Despite reports, Andrew was considering abdication; a person who has not yet taken to the throne cannot do so.
Although this is not an option, Andrew may have meant he wanted to renounce his right to succession.
The US Department of Justice released millions of new files related to Epstein on Friday.
Three million pages, 180,000 images and 2,000 videos were posted publicly, and one shocking photo showed Andrew kneeling over a woman on all fours, who was lying on the floor with her arms flat out beside her.
Just hours later, on Saturday, Andrew was spotted horse-riding around Windsor – with Body language expert Judi James saying this his true feelings are shown all over his face.
She told the Mirror: “On horseback there are two contrasting poses. In some photos he looks almost on parade with a straight back and one arm hanging at his side. This pose looks like the one he would strike when in dress uniform on horseback at the Cenotaph, a military look that might be in his muscle memory.
“Then there are some photos that see him looking slightly slumped and grim-faced as though the reality of his situation might finally be kicking in.”
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
