King Charles could be set to travel to the US to mark the 250th anniversary of the country’s independence next year, it has been reported. The visit, which could take place if his health allows him to travel, could spark speculation over whether the King will make time to visit his youngest son.
The visit, which has not yet been confirmed, could take place in April 2026 and may see Queen Camilla join her husband. Having moved to the US in 2020, Harry, 41, currently lives in California with Meghan Markle and their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
The King last saw Harry back in September, with the Duke of Sussex having travelled back to his home country to carry out a host of charitable engagements.
During his visit, Harry made time for a 50-minute conversation with his father at Clarence House in Westminster, London.
With the King potentially travelling to the US next year, royal fans have urged him to rethink a potential meeting with Harry.
In a poll conducted by the Express, which ran between 1.30pm on November 24 and 4.10pm on 25 November, fans were asked to share whether they think the pair should meet up, with a majority believing they should not meet up.
Of the total 4,832 people who voted, a staggering 4,190 voters [86.7 percent] were against the idea, compared to 551 [11.4 percent] who were in favour of a reunion between the King and Harry.
An additional 91 people [1.8 percent] shared that they weren’t sure whether a meeting should take place in the US. Taking to the comment section, one fan commented: “No, Charles shouldn’t visit Harry. If anything, Harry should make the effort to visit Charles….but we hope not…”
Another wrote: “No if course not, not in a million years.”
A third added that a meeting should take place with Harry and his children, but Meghan and Queen Camilla should not be included. They wrote: “King Charles and Prince Harry should meet with the grandkids. However, I would leave both of the ladies Meghan and Queen [Camilla] out of the meeting.”
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
