Meghan Markle has reportedly decided to “draw a red line” on any royal reunions in the future. According to a source, the Duchess of Sussex would allegedly not want to repeat the drama from their recent UK visit. It was reported that she didn’t like how the palace and the media treated Prince Harry. For those unversed, the duke visited his homeland for the Invictus Games before seemingly meeting his father. Reportedly, Markle and her kids joined Harry later for a reunion with King Charles.
Meghan Markle is not keen to have another royal reunion anytime in the future, per source
Meghan Markle would reportedly “not let this humiliation slide” during the recent royal reunion. A royal insider told Woman’s Day that there might not be another UK visit on the Duchess’s cards. “She’s told Harry there’s nothing for them in the UK and she’s drawing a red line on any future reunion.”
Markle and her kids, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, reportedly met King Charles after four years. Allegedly, the reunion was not smooth; instead, Harry’s UK visit drew a lot of negative press. Hence, the “Spare” alum seemingly decided not to get humiliated like this in the future.
Meanwhile, Harry has allegedly come to understand why his wife didn’t want their family to have any encounters with the royals. “Harry’s humiliated, not just by the royal rejections, but the realization his family do not care,” the insider added.
Furthermore, they stated that the duke might not be entirely okay with Markle’s reluctance towards their kids and King Charles ’ future reunions. “It’s fair to say he’s becoming just as disillusioned and resentful as Meghan and is starting to not care so much if Archie and Lilibet ever set foot in England again,” the source said.
Another insider shared that Markle allegedly has “no interest” in putting her family, especially her kids, through this turmoil ever again.
The post Meghan Markle ‘Drawing a Red Line’ on Future Royal Reunion — Source appeared first on Reality Tea.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.aol.com ’
