She was speaking at a memorial for children who died after becoming victims of alleged digital abuse in a solo trip jointly organised by Archewell Philanthropies and the World Health Organisation (WHO). Online critics claimed to have identified sections of the speech as generated by artificial intelligence, however, branding the use of large language models (LLMs) to produce copy espousing the dangerous of the internet “deeply ironic”.
A source told Radar Online: “There’s been a flood of commentary on forums from people insisting they ran part of Meghan’s address through AI detection systems like ChatGPT analysers and other LLM tools because the wording felt unusually polished, repetitive and rhythmically structured.”
They added: “Some critics are convinced it carried the hallmarks of AI-assisted drafting, whether that came directly from Meghan herself or from advisors helping craft the speech.
“What many people found deeply ironic is that the entire appearance centred on warning about the dangers of rapidly evolving technology and artificial intelligence potentially harming society, while critics are now accusing the speech itself of sounding algorithmically generated.
“Fairly or unfairly, that contradiction has become a major talking point online.”
Meghan warned world leaders that AI technologies were “not just repeating past mistakes” but “accelerating and amplifying” the digital dangers facing children in her address.
She said: “We are seeing new forms of harm emerge faster than our systems are prepared to respond, affecting children at an alarming scale and across borders.
“But these outcomes are not inevitable, and prevention begins with one simple principle: children must be safe by design, not safe by chance. Because danger now travels globally – instantly, invisibly, intimately. And our protections must do the same.”
Meghan and Prince Harry have both previously advocated for stronger protections for children online, including unveiling a memorial in New York City to young people who lost their lives due to the harmful effects of social media last April.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
