Prince Andrew’s team tried to hire “internet trolls to hassle” his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, while he hid behind the “well-guarded gates” of Balmoral Castle to avoid being served court papers, according to allegations in her posthumous memoir.
Giuffre wrote of the 2022 confidential settlement of her sexual abuse civil claim against the royal, widely rumoured to be $12m (£9m), that her lawyers “were going to ask for the moon” and her team had agreed it “had to be more than mere money”.
“After casting doubt on my credibility for so long – Prince Andrew’s team had even gone so far as to try to hire internet trolls to hassle me – the Duke of York owed me a meaningful apology as well,” she wrote.
“We would never get a confession, of course. That’s what settlements are designed to avoid. But we were trying for the next best thing: a general acknowledgment of what I’d been through.”
Giuffre agreed to a one-year gag clause so as not to “tarnish” the late queen’s platinum jubilee celebrations in 2022.
Giuffre died by suicide in April aged 41. Her memoir, Nobody’s Girl, published on Tuesday, comes amid growing pressure for Andrew to be officially stripped of his titles.
Before its publication, the prince announced he would no longer use his Duke of York or Knight of the Order of the Garter titles, which are extant but inactive.
As King Charles visited Manchester on Monday to show his support to the Jewish community and those affected by the terrorist attack at Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue on 2 October, pressure was growing on the royal family to go further by backing a move to formally strip Andrew of his dukedom through parliamentary legislation.
Downing Street would not be drawn on the matter, with the prime minister’s official spokesperson saying the question of legislation was “a matter for the palace in the first instance” and ministers “support the judgment of the king” regarding Andrew’s titles.
He added: “The prime minister’s thoughts are very much with the victims and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein who suffered and continue to suffer.”
Meanwhile, the Metropolitan police was “actively” looking into claims Andrew passed Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his police protection officer in an attempt to dig up dirt for a smear campaign, after reports in the Mail on Sunday.
A Buckingham Palace source said the new allegations were of “very serious and grave concern” and should be “examined in the appropriate way”.
They said action was needed because of “what lies at the heart of this, the broader allegations and the issues highlighted”.
The Mail on Sunday reported that Andrew had embarked on an effort to smear Giuffre in 2011. The prince’s alleged attempt, on which the officer is not said to have acted, came hours before the newspaper first published the photograph of Andrew with Giuffre.
In her book, Giuffre repeats her allegations, published in an exclusive extract by the Guardian, that she was forced to have sex with the prince on three occasions, including when she was 17 and also during an orgy after being trafficked by the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew vehemently denies the allegations.
Giuffre also claims her legal case against Andrew was strengthened by the royal’s own words in his disastrous 2019 Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis when he insisted he had no memory of meeting Giuffre, failed to apologise for his friendship with Epstein and failed to articulate any compassion for Epstein’s victims.
The immediate fallout saw him forced to withdraw from public life “for the foreseeable future”.
Giuffre wrote: “As devastating as this interview was for Prince Andrew, for my legal team it was like an injection of jet fuel.
“Its contents would not only help us build an ironclad case against the prince but also open the door to potentially subpoenaing his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, and their daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.”
The book reads: “Did he really take Beatrice out for pizza on March 10, 2001, as he claimed? If we deposed the princesses, his family members could potentially poke holes in his alibi.
“Would his medical records really show that he had a temporary case of anhidrosis (a lack of perspiration), which typically isn’t a response to adrenaline? We weren’t quite ready to sue yet, but this interview gave us a lot more to work with than we’d had before.”
Once she went ahead with her lawsuit, she said, the prince tried to hide at Balmoral. “Initially, the prince made it difficult for my lawyers to serve him with papers, fleeing to Queen Elizabeth’s Balmoral Castle in Scotland and hiding behind its well-guarded gates.”
A settlement was reached in 2022, thrashed out over “two days of mediation talks”. Giuffre read it through tears, she said.
In it Andrew accepted she had suffered “both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks”. He also commended her and other survivors “in standing up for themselves and others” and said he’d “never intended to malign [her] character”.
She wrote: “I agreed to a one-year gag order, which seemed important to the prince because it ensured that his mother’s Platinum Jubilee would not be tarnished any more than it already had been.”
She said she gained “more out of” Andrew than money because she had “an acknowledgment that I and many other women had been victimised and a tacit pledge to never deny it again”.
She said she looked forward to using the “Crown’s money to do some good” and said she began developing her Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (Soar) foundation to combat human trafficking.
She also revealed how the conspiracy theories surrounding Diana, Princess of Wales’s death affected her when she was allegedly forced to have sex with Andrew in London because she was “surrounded by people who wielded vastly more clout than I ever would”.
“I hadn’t wanted to have sex with the prince, I said, but I felt I had to,” she wrote, saying she believed there was no way to free herself from Epstein and Maxwell’s grip.
In her final chapter, Giuffre said: “I don’t regret it, but the constant telling and retelling has been extremely painful and exhausting.
“With this book, I seek to free myself from my past. From now on, anyone who wants to know about what happened can sit down with Nobody’s Girl and start reading.”
Giuffre wrote in an email to her co-writer Amy Wallace, after a car accident shortly before she died, that it was her “heartfelt wish that this work be published, regardless of my circumstances at the time”, and that it was still to be released in the event of her death.
“The content of this book is crucial, as it aims to shed light on the systemic failures that allow the trafficking of vulnerable individuals across borders,” she said in the email.
The Metropolitan police has said it is “actively” looking into claims Andrew passed Giuffre’s personal information to his police protection officer.
The Mail on Sunday reported he is said to have emailed the late queen’s then deputy press secretary, Ed Perkins, and told him of his request to his protection officer to investigate Guiffre, and also suggested she had a criminal record.
The prince’s alleged attempt, on which the police officer is not said to have acted, came in 2011, hours before the newspaper first published the photograph of Andrew with Giuffre. The newspaper said it obtained the email from disclosures held by the US Congress.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.theguardian.com ’
