The former Duchess has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the documents. However, sources claim that renewed media attention surrounding individuals mentioned in the filings has led to a noticeable cooling of invitations.
Royal author Andrew Lownie told Express.co.uk: “Sarah is still upset that they’re not being invited to red carpet events. This is their birthright, and somehow, people owe them something, and this is what they’ve just grown to expect, given so many things.”
Earlier this month, her charity, Sarah’s Trust, said it would close “for the foreseeable future” following the emergence of new details about her relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Fergie is mentioned several times in the latest tranche of documents released by the US Department of Justice. Correspondence indicates herself and her daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, flew to Miami to visit Epstein less than a week after he was released from prison in July 2009, with the email exchange implying he paid for the plane tickets.
In an email on August 3, 2009, she thanked Epstein for being “the brother I have always wished for” and told him she had “never been more touched by a friend’s kindness than your compliment to me in front of my girls”.
Ensure our latest royal headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or just add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
Neither she nor the couple’s two daughters, Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, have made a public statement since the police detained the former prince on Thursday.
Previous reports indicate that he may have improperly shared confidential government documents with the disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while he served as a trade envoy for the British government from 2001 to 2011.
Sarah ceased to be a Duchess when Andrew was stripped of the use of his Duke of York title last year.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
