Sarah Ferguson told Jeffrey Epstein he was the “brother I have always wished for” and later said she needed £20,000 for rent following the collapse of her business venture, according to newly released documents.
Emails published by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) reveal the depth of Ms Ferguson’s friendship with Epstein and suggest the disgraced financier wanted her help to clear his name.
In one email exchange from 2009, the then Duchess of York updated Epstein on potential opportunities for her business brands and books.
“In just one week, after your lunch, it seems the energy has lifted”, she wrote.
“I have never been more touched by a friends [sic] kindness than your compliment to me infront of my girls.
“Thank you Jeffrey for being the brother I have always wished for.”
The next year, in another email between “Sarah” and Epstein she calls him a “legend” and describes her “gratitude” for him.
She added: “Xx I am at your service . Just marry me.”
Another email exchange believed to be from Epstein to three others, including his publicist, in March 2011 said: “I think Fergie can now say, I am not a pedo.”
It adds: “She was DUPED into believeing [sic] false stories.”
At the time, Epstein had been accused of abusing dozens of teenage girls between 1999 and 2007. He avoided federal sex trafficking charges and served 13 months in jail for lesser state charges of soliciting prostitution from someone under 18 in 2008.
Emails show Epstein’s publicist at the time Mike Sitrick said they have a strategy to “get newspapers to stop calling you a pedophile” and one was to get “Fergie to retract”.
“Sarah” emailed Epstein a month later saying she “did not” and “would not” call him a “P”, and that she had acted to “protect my own brand”.
In 2009, Ferguson wrote to Epstein and said: “I urgently need 20,000 pounds ($27,521) for rent today.
“The landlord has threatened to go to the newspapers if I don’t pay. Any brainwaves?”
The email exchange started between Epstein and David Stern, a lawyer and former commissioner of the National Basketball Association (NBA) in the US, who shared a copy of an ABC article questioning if Ferguson’s finances were in “jeopardy”.
Epstein suggests the leak could come from “disgruntled investors” and Ferguson replies confirming an investor has “broken a confidentiality agreement”.
Although the email chain appears to end once she explains that she needs money for rent, elsewhere an email from Epstein claims to have helped her financially for 15 years.
In several emails, Ferguson’s daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are named, including Epstein asking if they are free to say hello in July 2010.
Emails in July 2009 also indicate a lunch was held between Ferguson, her daughters and Epstein.
Epstein was invited to several events involving the royal family giving him access to British high society.
Then Prince Andrew’s private secretary Amanda Thirsk wrote to Epstein on behalf of Ferguson in February 2010, to invite him to Andrew’s 50th birthday party at St James’s Palace in London.
Another email from Epstein to hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin in 2009 claims “fergie said she could organize tea in the buckingham palace apts.. or windsor castle” [sic].
A message sent by Ferguson to Epstein congratulating the paedophile on the birth of a “baby boy” after he was released from jail in 2011, suggests he had a secret child, The Telegraph reported.
“Don’t know if you are still on this BBM but heard from The Duke that you have had a baby boy. Even though you never kept in touch, I am still here with love, friendship and congratulations on your baby boy. Sarah xx,” she said in the message sent 15 years ago.
But it has never been established if Epstein had any children.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, whose titles have already been stripped, will soon move out of the Royal Lodge. His ex-wife Ferguson will also need to move home and has already been dropped by several charities over her links to Epstein.
Representatives of Sarah Ferguson declined to comment.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.independent.co.uk ’
