The last time the Sussexes travelled to Australia was in 2018, but this new trip will be vastly different from the pomp and pageantry of their first. It is understood that Harry and Meghan’s two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, will not be joining them.
Now a royal expert has noted the Sussexes’ “ability to get publicity” and added that their new trip is likely to cause unease in royal circles.
Veteran royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told the Daily Express: “The Sussexes’ ‘faux royal’ tour to Australia is intended to boost their brand. One thing is undeniable. their ability to get publicity is extraordinary.
“However, in contrast to their 2018 tour, when they were working members of the Royal Family, this looks very dubious.
“It has become notorious owing to Meghan’s main activity, her so-called all-women Wellness Weekend at the Inter InterContinental Sydney Coogee Beach Hotel.
“Harry is likely to undertake engagements linked to the military as well as speaking at the Inter Edge Summit on mental health. What actually happens will be fascinating.”
Mr Fitzwilliams added: “It is also likely to upset the Palace as Australia is one of the King’s realms and was due a visit by the Prince and Princess of Wales, who were last there in 2014.
“One thing is for certain, they are getting attention.”
One of the most anticipated events from the Sussex trip is a women-only gathering in Sydney, where tickets cost £1,440 per person and the Duchess will take part in an on-stage interview.
The Her Best Life Retreat will welcome up to 300 women for a three-day luxury event from April 17 to 19 at the five-star InterContinental Hotel.
Meghan is set to appear as a guest speaker, with the programme including a gala dinner featuring an in-person conversation with Meghan, as well as “powerful conversations, relaxation, laughter and unforgettable experiences”, according to organisers.
VIP tickets include premium seating at a table in the front two rows for the gala dinner, as well as a group photo opportunity with Meghan.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.express.co.uk ’
