Prince William and King Charles have reportedly been in a strong disagreement over whether to accept Sarah Ferguson’s alleged requests. According to sources, she has allegedly sought the monarch’s help to achieve long-term financial security. While the King might be willing to “compromise,” the Prince of Wales has reportedly opposed the idea.
For those unversed, Fergie was Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s ex-wife and stayed with him even after their divorce. She also lost her Duchess of York title and stayed away from the royal palace during the Andrew-arrest drama.
Sarah Ferguson’s request has caused friction between Prince William and King Charles, per source
Sarah Ferguson has reportedly been seeking financial help from King Charles, but Prince William appears to be opposed to it. A source told RadarOnline that the author has allegedly suggested to the king that she would not do a tell-all if he agrees to her request. She was one of the closest royals to the monarchy; hence, she might know many secrets. “So naturally there is interest in what she might choose to say publicly in the future,” an insider said.
According to another source, Charles would appear to want to maintain a “cordial” relationship with Ferguson. He “believes stability is best achieved through compromise.” However, William has opposite opinions and beliefs. He would reportedly not agree to any “arrangement that appears to reward silence.”
Moreover, the future king would seemingly not want to send a “wrong message” to the public. He has a vision to “modernize the institution,” and compromising might work against it. “[William] is ready to go to war with Charles over his stance of not giving Sarah a penny as he sees it as a bribe to buy her silence that could backfire on the monarchy long-term, especially as she is a loose cannon who could take the money and then decided to go rogue anyway,” they added.
Originally written by Suushmmita Sen on Reality Tea.
The post Prince William & King Charles at War Over This Royal — Source appeared first on Mandatory.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.yahoo.com ’
