Royal watchers were captivated—and fiercely divided—on November 18, as Queen Camilla hosted the annual Diplomatic Corps reception alongside King Charles III at Windsor Castle. For the white-tie event, the Queen selected a piece of jewelry that immediately signaled controversy: the Greville Emerald Kokoshnik tiara, the headpiece Princess Eugenie wore for her 2018 wedding. The tiara had not been seen publicly on any royal since Eugenie’s nuptials, and royal observers immediately took to social platforms to debate the highly unusual timing and significance of Camilla’s choice.
Royal Etiquette Fail? The Princess Eugenie Tiara Connection
Many fans expressed strong disapproval, arguing that the Queen was appropriating a deeply personal moment from a junior member of the family. The main point of contention was that wearing the piece diluted its meaning for Princess Eugenie. One Reddit commenter stated the issue bluntly: “it’s tacky in my opinion for a senior royal to appropriate a younger royals highly personal symbolic piece for herself.” This observer noted the action dilutes “the tiaras association to Eugenie and her one main character moment.”
Another fan agreed, citing tradition: “My understanding is that there is an unspoken rule that when a tiara is worn for a wedding that becomes a symbol of that person. So typically the tiara does not get worn again by another royal, at least while the bride is still alive.” Adding to the criticism was the styling. One watcher criticized the presentation, stating, “I frankly do not like this at all… The least they could do is style her hair properly. Those wires on display look messy and make her look unkempt.”
The Counter Argument: The Greville Emerald Kokoshnik Tiara Ownership
Despite the criticism, many fans and commentators defended the Queen’s choice, pointing out that the tiara, which dates back to 1919 and was made by Boucheron, is technically the property of the Crown. One fan countered the etiquette argument: “Technically she owns it so she can do whatever she wants… It’s a beautiful tiara. It was on loan to Eugenie. I don’t see any reason why Camila can’t wear it. It’s part of the Crown Jewels.”
Others suggested the choice was driven by support for the York sisters, especially amid recent controversies surrounding their family. One theory suggested a gesture of solidarity: “I think she wore it in support of Eugene [sic].” This was supported by a more political theory: “I think because of everything going on with Andrew, this might be a statement of sorts. Like them taking the royal positions back from the Yorks or something.”
The $13 Million Price Tag and Queen Camilla’s Message
The Greville Emerald Kokoshnik Tiara is estimated to be worth millions—some diamond specialists place its value at approximately $13 million—due to its massive 93.70-carat emerald center stone. The consensus among royal watchers is that while Queen Camilla has every right to wear the stunning piece, the decision to debut a specific wedding tiara so soon after the bride wore it ensures the debate over etiquette and intent will continue for some time.
This story was originally reported by Parade on Nov 19, 2025, where it first appeared in the News section. Add Parade as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
‘ The preceding article may include information circulated by third parties ’
‘ Some details of this article were extracted from the following source www.aol.com ’
